原文： Viewing the issue in this manner allows use of traditional patentability rules and permits a more precise analysis than determining whether an accused product (which has no claim limitations on which to focus) would have been obvious in view of the prior art. 我翻的： 不論被告產品(which has no claim limitations on which to focus)相對於先前技術是 否顯著，在這規則中允許了傳統專利權法規則的適用，而且允許了比裁判更為精準的分析 。 關於括號內，我以為他是說被告產品沒有聲明限制，但就不知道focus on所欲表示的意思。 我朋友認為是：被告產品並未注意到聲明限制。 在推回去好了，將括號內還原：the product has no claim limitations to focus on claim limitations(還是products?) 完整正確回答的我願意付1000p...有請英文+專利法大師回答了 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.228.111.158