Health 板


LINE

原本想po兩個美國的醫療過失判例上來,然後分析其中關於 醫療過失的認定標準,作為大家的參考,但是,因為我慣用 的法律搜尋系統找不到我學過的Case,所以,我只好從goo- gle上找來其中一個Case的case brief,就是我們平常上課的 時候常常被老師要求寫的家庭作業。 這份case brief的作者無法在網路上查到,但是好像是來自 University Casebook的出版商,網址是: lawschool.mikeshecket.com/torts/moorevtheregentsoftheuniversityofcalifornia.htm 嗯,anyway,這份brief已經讓英美法每學期都在及格邊緣的 我汗顏了... Moore v. The Regents of the University of California Supreme Court of California, 1990. 51 Cal.3d 120, 793 P.2d 479, 271 Cal.Rptr. 146. ( Prosser, pp. 188-191 ) Facts: The plaintiff went in for treatment of leukemia. The defendant used cells from his spleen for profit. The plaintiff sued for a bunch of stuff including conversion of his spleen cells, lack of informed consent, and breach of fiduciary[1] duty. Issue: Does a physician have a duty to inform the patient of his economic interest in a particular course of treatment? Rule: A physician must tell the patient if he has personal interests that may affect his professional judgment. If he fails to do so, he may be liable for malpractice based on breach of informed consent. Analysis: The court uses three principles: 1. An adult has the right to control his own body. 2. Consent is only effective if it is informed consent. 3. The doctor must tell you about everything that is material to your decision to give consent. Thus, a doctor, in getting your informed consent, must tell you about all of his interests that may affect his judgment, or else he may be liable for performing medical procedures without informed consent. There is a competing interest in withholding information if giving the information would make a patient make a bad choice. However, the court feels that this applies only in cases where the doctor is acting solely in the patient’s best interests. The court finds that this is not the case here. Conclusion: A bunch of stuff happens, but essentially the court rules that there must be a consideration of the merits of the causes of action for lack of informed consent and breach of fiduciary duty on the part of the doctor who took the spleen. --



※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.223.95.101 ※ 編輯: ltlfox 來自: 61.223.95.101 (01/30 00:55)







like.gif 您可能會有興趣的文章
icon.png[問題/行為] 貓晚上進房間會不會有憋尿問題
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] 選了錯誤的女孩成為魔法少女 XDDDDDDDDDD
icon.png[正妹] 瑞典 一張
icon.png[心得] EMS高領長版毛衣.墨小樓MC1002
icon.png[分享] 丹龍隔熱紙GE55+33+22
icon.png[問題] 清洗洗衣機
icon.png[尋物] 窗台下的空間
icon.png[閒聊] 双極の女神1 木魔爵
icon.png[售車] 新竹 1997 march 1297cc 白色 四門
icon.png[討論] 能從照片感受到攝影者心情嗎
icon.png[狂賀] 賀賀賀賀 賀!島村卯月!總選舉NO.1
icon.png[難過] 羨慕白皮膚的女生
icon.png閱讀文章
icon.png[黑特]
icon.png[問題] SBK S1安裝於安全帽位置
icon.png[分享] 舊woo100絕版開箱!!
icon.pngRe: [無言] 關於小包衛生紙
icon.png[開箱] E5-2683V3 RX480Strix 快睿C1 簡單測試
icon.png[心得] 蒼の海賊龍 地獄 執行者16PT
icon.png[售車] 1999年Virage iO 1.8EXi
icon.png[心得] 挑戰33 LV10 獅子座pt solo
icon.png[閒聊] 手把手教你不被桶之新手主購教學
icon.png[分享] Civic Type R 量產版官方照無預警流出
icon.png[售車] Golf 4 2.0 銀色 自排
icon.png[出售] Graco提籃汽座(有底座)2000元誠可議
icon.png[問題] 請問補牙材質掉了還能再補嗎?(台中半年內
icon.png[問題] 44th 單曲 生寫竟然都給重複的啊啊!
icon.png[心得] 華南紅卡/icash 核卡
icon.png[問題] 拔牙矯正這樣正常嗎
icon.png[贈送] 老莫高業 初業 102年版
icon.png[情報] 三大行動支付 本季掀戰火
icon.png[寶寶] 博客來Amos水蠟筆5/1特價五折
icon.pngRe: [心得] 新鮮人一些面試分享
icon.png[心得] 蒼の海賊龍 地獄 麒麟25PT
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] (君の名は。雷慎入) 君名二創漫畫翻譯
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] OGN中場影片:失蹤人口局 (英文字幕)
icon.png[問題] 台灣大哥大4G訊號差
icon.png[出售] [全國]全新千尋侘草LED燈, 水草

請輸入看板名稱,例如:WOW站內搜尋

TOP