Health 板


LINE

原本想po两个美国的医疗过失判例上来,然後分析其中关於 医疗过失的认定标准,作为大家的参考,但是,因为我惯用 的法律搜寻系统找不到我学过的Case,所以,我只好从goo- gle上找来其中一个Case的case brief,就是我们平常上课的 时候常常被老师要求写的家庭作业。 这份case brief的作者无法在网路上查到,但是好像是来自 University Casebook的出版商,网址是: lawschool.mikeshecket.com/torts/moorevtheregentsoftheuniversityofcalifornia.htm 嗯,anyway,这份brief已经让英美法每学期都在及格边缘的 我汗颜了... Moore v. The Regents of the University of California Supreme Court of California, 1990. 51 Cal.3d 120, 793 P.2d 479, 271 Cal.Rptr. 146. ( Prosser, pp. 188-191 ) Facts: The plaintiff went in for treatment of leukemia. The defendant used cells from his spleen for profit. The plaintiff sued for a bunch of stuff including conversion of his spleen cells, lack of informed consent, and breach of fiduciary[1] duty. Issue: Does a physician have a duty to inform the patient of his economic interest in a particular course of treatment? Rule: A physician must tell the patient if he has personal interests that may affect his professional judgment. If he fails to do so, he may be liable for malpractice based on breach of informed consent. Analysis: The court uses three principles: 1. An adult has the right to control his own body. 2. Consent is only effective if it is informed consent. 3. The doctor must tell you about everything that is material to your decision to give consent. Thus, a doctor, in getting your informed consent, must tell you about all of his interests that may affect his judgment, or else he may be liable for performing medical procedures without informed consent. There is a competing interest in withholding information if giving the information would make a patient make a bad choice. However, the court feels that this applies only in cases where the doctor is acting solely in the patient’s best interests. The court finds that this is not the case here. Conclusion: A bunch of stuff happens, but essentially the court rules that there must be a consideration of the merits of the causes of action for lack of informed consent and breach of fiduciary duty on the part of the doctor who took the spleen. --



※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.223.95.101 ※ 编辑: ltlfox 来自: 61.223.95.101 (01/30 00:55)







like.gif 您可能会有兴趣的文章
icon.png[问题/行为] 猫晚上进房间会不会有憋尿问题
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] 选了错误的女孩成为魔法少女 XDDDDDDDDDD
icon.png[正妹] 瑞典 一张
icon.png[心得] EMS高领长版毛衣.墨小楼MC1002
icon.png[分享] 丹龙隔热纸GE55+33+22
icon.png[问题] 清洗洗衣机
icon.png[寻物] 窗台下的空间
icon.png[闲聊] 双极の女神1 木魔爵
icon.png[售车] 新竹 1997 march 1297cc 白色 四门
icon.png[讨论] 能从照片感受到摄影者心情吗
icon.png[狂贺] 贺贺贺贺 贺!岛村卯月!总选举NO.1
icon.png[难过] 羡慕白皮肤的女生
icon.png阅读文章
icon.png[黑特]
icon.png[问题] SBK S1安装於安全帽位置
icon.png[分享] 旧woo100绝版开箱!!
icon.pngRe: [无言] 关於小包卫生纸
icon.png[开箱] E5-2683V3 RX480Strix 快睿C1 简单测试
icon.png[心得] 苍の海贼龙 地狱 执行者16PT
icon.png[售车] 1999年Virage iO 1.8EXi
icon.png[心得] 挑战33 LV10 狮子座pt solo
icon.png[闲聊] 手把手教你不被桶之新手主购教学
icon.png[分享] Civic Type R 量产版官方照无预警流出
icon.png[售车] Golf 4 2.0 银色 自排
icon.png[出售] Graco提篮汽座(有底座)2000元诚可议
icon.png[问题] 请问补牙材质掉了还能再补吗?(台中半年内
icon.png[问题] 44th 单曲 生写竟然都给重复的啊啊!
icon.png[心得] 华南红卡/icash 核卡
icon.png[问题] 拔牙矫正这样正常吗
icon.png[赠送] 老莫高业 初业 102年版
icon.png[情报] 三大行动支付 本季掀战火
icon.png[宝宝] 博客来Amos水蜡笔5/1特价五折
icon.pngRe: [心得] 新鲜人一些面试分享
icon.png[心得] 苍の海贼龙 地狱 麒麟25PT
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] (君の名は。雷慎入) 君名二创漫画翻译
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] OGN中场影片:失踪人口局 (英文字幕)
icon.png[问题] 台湾大哥大4G讯号差
icon.png[出售] [全国]全新千寻侘草LED灯, 水草

请输入看板名称,例如:WOW站内搜寻

TOP