本文於2011.10.21 由法羅群島玩家Maverick_Bluehair發表於Wing Market & Discussion論壇 (註:老實說，我覺得這篇作者寫爛了，我完全無法意會作者想寫啥) What, then, is the preferred training sequence for wingbacks? 好的，有比較推薦的邊後衛的訓練策略嗎 ? As with the wingers, people would argue that they should be trained according to usefulness. So the argument would go that in the case of wingbacks, they should first be trained in winger. This will allow you to use them as offensive wingbacks (for a killer side attack) while you train them in defending. If you would train them in defending first, you’d be faced with the decision to either have a high skilled defender making a relatively small contribution to your defense when played as (defensive) winger, play him twice a week to fully utilize his defending skill (once as defender/wingback, once as winger for training), or to just put him in the 50% wingback training slot and thus train him at half speed only. 在選擇邊鋒訓練位的訓練球員時，很容易遇到訓練vs比賽成績的兩難抉擇 很多玩家會優先根據球員是否能對比賽評級做出貢獻，決定邊鋒訓練位的球員人選， (註:有時你要訓練後衛的邊鋒技能，那麼你需要把後衛擺在邊鋒， 但是如此對堆比賽評級是沒有用的。) 同樣的兩難抉擇，也出現在邊後衛的訓練位選擇。 在邊後衛訓練位擺上一個真正的邊鋒是優先選擇，可以讓該球員踢進攻型邊後衛， 如此同時可以堆出不錯的邊路進攻評級，以及滿足球員的訓練。 如果你在訓練後衛的邊鋒技能，你有三個選擇 1. 讓後衛踢(防守型)邊鋒，防守評級的貢獻較低，但是得到100%訓練效果。 2. 讓後衛一週上場兩次，一場踢後衛拼比賽成績、一場踢邊鋒滿足訓練效果。 3. 讓後衛踢邊後衛，能對防守評級做出貢獻，但是只能得到50%的訓練效果。 Having trained his defending and winger up to an acceptable level, you could consider adding some playmaking, since neutral and offensive wingbacks do use a noticeable part of their playmaking (23% for offensive, 16,7% for neutral) or some passing, if you use CA/AIM/AOW. Remember that passing training adds nothing to their attacking contribution. 在訓練後衛以及邊鋒的邊鋒技能到不錯的等級時， 你可以考慮讓球員有一些組織進攻技能，因為正常站位邊後衛以及進攻型邊後衛， 組織進攻技能都對比賽評級有所貢獻(進攻型邊鋒23%、正常站位16.7%)。 如果你選擇踢防守反擊/中路進攻/邊路進攻戰術時， 也可以考慮讓球員擁有一些傳球技能。 謹記，邊後衛的傳球技能，不會對比賽的進攻評級做出貢獻， 僅對特定戰術的戰術評級會有貢獻。 (註:這句怪怪的，我不太確定作者的原意是不是這樣) --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 1.34.189.91