各位板友好！ 做到一題 Magoosh 的邏輯題， 在選項 A 跟 C 之間猶豫。 題目： http://i.imgur.com/FfVw7wR.png A senator, near the end of his first six-year term and running for reelection, made the claim: “Citizens of our state are thriving. While national unemployment levels have remained high, our state unemployment rate has been at astonishingly low levels for eleven years running. Clearly, everyone in our state has benefited from the economical packages I have introduced during my time in the Senate. Therefore, grateful citizens of our state ought to vote for my second term.” A) It takes a condition to be the effect of something that has happened only after the condition already existed. B) It introduces several different types of evidence, not all of which are compatible with one another. C) It conflates political conditions with economic conditions. D) The economical packages introduced by the senator may not have been as beneficial to citizens of other states. E) Even if what the senator is saying is true, it may not be in his self-interest to argue in favor of it. 解析： http://i.imgur.com/yj65uCa.png 正解為 A，想請問各位，為何不能選 C 呢？ C) It conflates political conditions with economic conditions. 原文中提到： Clearly, everyone in our state has benefited from the economical packages I have introduced during my time in the Senate. Therefore, grateful citizens of our state ought to vote for my second term. 這樣豈不是把經濟狀況與其整體政治表現混為一談了嗎？ 只因為 everyone in our state has benefited from the economical packages 就說大家應該將選票投給他？ 想聽聽各位的想法？ 謝謝！ --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.224.96.42 ※ 文章網址: https://webptt.com/m.aspx?n=bbs/GRE/M.1427085929.A.AB0.html ※ 編輯: pcgeek (36.224.96.42), 03/23/2015 12:49:45 ※ 編輯: pcgeek (36.224.96.42), 03/23/2015 12:56:23 ※ 編輯: pcgeek (36.224.101.175), 03/23/2015 16:04:29 ※ 編輯: pcgeek (36.224.101.175), 03/23/2015 16:09:56