各位板友好！ 做到一题 Magoosh 的逻辑题， 在选项 A 跟 C 之间犹豫。 题目： http://i.imgur.com/FfVw7wR.png A senator, near the end of his first six-year term and running for reelection, made the claim: “Citizens of our state are thriving. While national unemployment levels have remained high, our state unemployment rate has been at astonishingly low levels for eleven years running. Clearly, everyone in our state has benefited from the economical packages I have introduced during my time in the Senate. Therefore, grateful citizens of our state ought to vote for my second term.” A) It takes a condition to be the effect of something that has happened only after the condition already existed. B) It introduces several different types of evidence, not all of which are compatible with one another. C) It conflates political conditions with economic conditions. D) The economical packages introduced by the senator may not have been as beneficial to citizens of other states. E) Even if what the senator is saying is true, it may not be in his self-interest to argue in favor of it. 解析： http://i.imgur.com/yj65uCa.png 正解为 A，想请问各位，为何不能选 C 呢？ C) It conflates political conditions with economic conditions. 原文中提到： Clearly, everyone in our state has benefited from the economical packages I have introduced during my time in the Senate. Therefore, grateful citizens of our state ought to vote for my second term. 这样岂不是把经济状况与其整体政治表现混为一谈了吗？ 只因为 everyone in our state has benefited from the economical packages 就说大家应该将选票投给他？ 想听听各位的想法？ 谢谢！ --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 36.224.96.42 ※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/GRE/M.1427085929.A.AB0.html ※ 编辑: pcgeek (36.224.96.42), 03/23/2015 12:49:45 ※ 编辑: pcgeek (36.224.96.42), 03/23/2015 12:56:23 ※ 编辑: pcgeek (36.224.101.175), 03/23/2015 16:04:29 ※ 编辑: pcgeek (36.224.101.175), 03/23/2015 16:09:56