※ 引述《mathloving (煩)》之銘言： : In 1993 the rubber, clothing, and shipbuilding industries put into : effect a six-hour workday, not as a temporary expedient but as a : seemingly permanent accommodation to what many observers thought was : ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ : an economy made overproductive by advances in technology. : ~~~~~~~~~~ : 我已經替換好正確答案 畫線的地方看不太懂 : 白勇說 what many observers thought was 是同位結構 解釋後面的名詞economy : 可是我還是看不太懂耶= = : 希望有人幫我解答這結構 : 謝謝 借前輩的文章po一下 有幾位大大提及用sth. that來替換 等於變成 accommodation to sth. that many observers thought was an economy 所以轉換完是變成 many observers thought that was an economy v. v. 這樣似乎不是太合理 尤其GMAT的文法嚴謹 不大可能是省略 that(引導賓語從句連詞) that 也不能單獨作主語 追夢上有大大說這個thought作n. many observers thought似乎也有問題 所以想問問一下各位高手這裡白勇所稱的同位結構要怎麼分析呀~~ 謝謝各位的回答~~ --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.169.18.76