作者a2515125 (Bobshih)
看板GMAT
標題[語文] gwd8-14 logic
時間Wed Sep 16 16:39:31 2009
Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites,
including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives.
However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none
of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are
allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers
without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative
effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding
any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.
B. Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce
the allergic reactions.
C. Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.
D. Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present
in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.
E. Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by
these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic
reaction in someone who drinks these wines.
Answer E
請問D哪裡錯了 E又怎麼對了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.129.138.225
1F：推 fshy:題目有allergic to fulsites ~ 有限定範圍 所以D不是正確 09/16 23:26
2F：→ fshy:sulfites 打錯 @@" E取非後就是反駁原文結論啦 09/16 23:27
3F：→ fshy:第ㄧ行補充ㄧ下, 是結論有限定範圍. (剛唸完書回來都暈了) 09/16 23:29
4F：→ fshy:所謂限定範圍是 without risking an allergic reaction to su 09/16 23:33
5F：→ fshy:這ㄧ句 ~ 囉哩雜八寫了一堆無用的 ~ sorry囉 09/16 23:34