作者a2515125 (Bobshih)
看板GMAT
标题[语文] gwd8-14 logic
时间Wed Sep 16 16:39:31 2009
Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites,
including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives.
However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none
of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are
allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers
without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative
effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding
any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.
B. Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce
the allergic reactions.
C. Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.
D. Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present
in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.
E. Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by
these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic
reaction in someone who drinks these wines.
Answer E
请问D哪里错了 E又怎麽对了
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.129.138.225
1F：推 fshy:题目有allergic to fulsites ~ 有限定范围 所以D不是正确 09/16 23:26
2F：→ fshy:sulfites 打错 @@" E取非後就是反驳原文结论啦 09/16 23:27
3F：→ fshy:第ㄧ行补充ㄧ下, 是结论有限定范围. (刚念完书回来都晕了) 09/16 23:29
4F：→ fshy:所谓限定范围是 without risking an allergic reaction to su 09/16 23:33
5F：→ fshy:这ㄧ句 ~ 罗哩杂八写了一堆无用的 ~ sorry罗 09/16 23:34