下面這題想請問大家 Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild. The countries in which the tigers’ habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting. Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured. The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument? (A) assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced (B) considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species (C) fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers (D) neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting (E) takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers’ survival as a guarantee of their survival 我對題目的理解是: 禁止hunting-->tiger就會存活下來, 題目問禁止hunting的這個原因最容易遭受什麼批評 答案是(E) 我有點不懂 我覺得(C)說的也沒有錯阿 獵人捕到老虎的機率不高, 不就是說禁止hunting無法有效 讓tiger存活 麻煩大家解答...謝謝 ps. 這個月到現在居然都還沒換題...22號考不就要準備裸考@@ --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.168.66.241