下面这题想请问大家 Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild. The countries in which the tigers’ habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting. Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured. The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument? (A) assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced (B) considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species (C) fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers (D) neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting (E) takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers’ survival as a guarantee of their survival 我对题目的理解是: 禁止hunting-->tiger就会存活下来, 题目问禁止hunting的这个原因最容易遭受什麽批评 答案是(E) 我有点不懂 我觉得(C)说的也没有错阿 猎人捕到老虎的机率不高, 不就是说禁止hunting无法有效 让tiger存活 麻烦大家解答...谢谢 ps. 这个月到现在居然都还没换题...22号考不就要准备裸考@@ --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.168.66.241