作者pringless (pringles~*)
看板GMAT
標題[語文] PP1#20 #23
時間Sun Jan 11 17:29:14 2009
20.
For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged
by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city. There has been
little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop
on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. The city has
now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so damage
to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument?
請問(B) Palitito's Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other
than engine exhaust.為甚麼不對？
我的想法是反駁的反駁 把not拿掉的話 建築物是受到其他污染所影響 所以反駁原文
not丟回去變成反駁的反駁 請教各位牛人我的思路什麼地方錯了 謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.168.45.122
1F：推 iammarsman:other than engine exhaust跳脫議題 01/11 18:52
2F：→ pringless:什麼意思＠＠a 是因為原文只有說exhaust B卻說engine 01/12 08:15
3F：→ pringless:exhaust嗎？？ 01/12 08:15
4F：推 iammarsman:比如說王建明棒球投得好->他是好投手,另一個人跟你說王 01/12 09:24
5F：→ iammarsman:建明保齡球也投得很好->他是好投手,同樣都是球，但是 01/12 09:25
6F：→ iammarsman:仍沒法支持原來的說法 01/12 09:25