作者pringless (pringles~*)
看板GMAT
标题[语文] PP1#20 #23
时间Sun Jan 11 17:29:14 2009
20.
For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged
by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city. There has been
little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop
on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. The city has
now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so damage
to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument?
请问(B) Palitito's Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other
than engine exhaust.为甚麽不对？
我的想法是反驳的反驳 把not拿掉的话 建筑物是受到其他污染所影响 所以反驳原文
not丢回去变成反驳的反驳 请教各位牛人我的思路什麽地方错了 谢谢
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.168.45.122
1F：推 iammarsman:other than engine exhaust跳脱议题 01/11 18:52
2F：→ pringless:什麽意思＠＠a 是因为原文只有说exhaust B却说engine 01/12 08:15
3F：→ pringless:exhaust吗？？ 01/12 08:15
4F：推 iammarsman:比如说王建明棒球投得好->他是好投手,另一个人跟你说王 01/12 09:24
5F：→ iammarsman:建明保龄球也投得很好->他是好投手,同样都是球，但是 01/12 09:25
6F：→ iammarsman:仍没法支持原来的说法 01/12 09:25