※ 引述《kimoqueen (AT苦海何時能解脫~ @_@)》之銘言： : 73. There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially : confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the : confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific findings, namely, : the replication of results by other scientists. : Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientists, : which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, : is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other : scientists conduct experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results. : Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument? : (A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before : they are replicated. : (B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted : to peer review before publication. : (C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to : the scrutiny of replication. : (D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud. : (E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone. : Answer: A 這題我不了 選不出答案 A怎麼解釋都很怪 : ____________________________________________________________________________ : Questions 78-79 : Despite improvements in treatment for asthma, the death rate from this : disease has doubled during the past decade from its previous rate. : Two possible explanations for this increase have been offered. First, : the recording of deaths due to asthma has become more widespread and : accurate in the past decade than it had been previously. : Second, there has been an increase in urban pollution. 以下開始是重點 : However, since the rate of deaths due to asthma has increased dramatically : even in cities with long-standing, : comprehensive medical records and with little or no urban pollution, 這裡說上面兩點都不對 : one must instead conclude that the cause of increased deaths is the use : of bronchial inhalers by asthma sufferers to relieve their symptoms. 這裡說作者認為的原因--bronchial inhalers是生病的重要因素 : 78. Each of the following, if true, provides support to the argument EXCEPT: 要找支持作者的論點 也就是反駁two possible explanations : (A) Urban populations have doubled in the past decade. 這解釋作者不支持 : (B) Records of asthma deaths are as accurate for the past twenty years : as for the past ten years. 反駁解釋 : (C) Evidence suggests that inhalers make the lungs more sensitive to : irritation by airborne pollen. 支持論點 : (D) By temporarily relieving the symptoms of asthma, inhalers encourage : sufferers to avoid more beneficial measures. 支持論點 : (E) Ten years ago bronchial inhalers were not available as an asthma treatment. 支持論點 : Answer: A : 79. Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? : (A) Urban pollution has not doubled in the past decade. 無關 : (B) Doctors and patients generally ignore the role of allergies in asthma. 無關 : (C) Bronchial inhalers are unsafe, even when used according to the : recommended instructions. 不像是assumption 像support : (D) The use of bronchial inhalers aggravates other diseases that : frequently occur among asthma sufferers and that often lead to fatal : outcomes even when the asthma itself does not. 比較不像是assumption 比較像是support : (E) Increased urban pollution, improved recording of asthma deaths, : and the used of asthma deaths, and the use of bronchial inhalers are the : only possible explanations of the increased death rate due to asthma. 假設就只有這幾個原因 不會天外飛來一個"另有他因" 所以反駁完explanations就ok : Answer: E 這是我的看法 歡迎指教 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 219.70.208.217 ※ 編輯: Anero 來自: 219.70.208.217 (12/16 18:14)