※ 引述《kimoqueen (AT苦海何时能解脱~ @_@)》之铭言： : 73. There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially : confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the : confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific findings, namely, : the replication of results by other scientists. : Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientists, : which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, : is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other : scientists conduct experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results. : Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument? : (A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before : they are replicated. : (B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted : to peer review before publication. : (C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to : the scrutiny of replication. : (D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud. : (E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone. : Answer: A 这题我不了 选不出答案 A怎麽解释都很怪 : ____________________________________________________________________________ : Questions 78-79 : Despite improvements in treatment for asthma, the death rate from this : disease has doubled during the past decade from its previous rate. : Two possible explanations for this increase have been offered. First, : the recording of deaths due to asthma has become more widespread and : accurate in the past decade than it had been previously. : Second, there has been an increase in urban pollution. 以下开始是重点 : However, since the rate of deaths due to asthma has increased dramatically : even in cities with long-standing, : comprehensive medical records and with little or no urban pollution, 这里说上面两点都不对 : one must instead conclude that the cause of increased deaths is the use : of bronchial inhalers by asthma sufferers to relieve their symptoms. 这里说作者认为的原因--bronchial inhalers是生病的重要因素 : 78. Each of the following, if true, provides support to the argument EXCEPT: 要找支持作者的论点 也就是反驳two possible explanations : (A) Urban populations have doubled in the past decade. 这解释作者不支持 : (B) Records of asthma deaths are as accurate for the past twenty years : as for the past ten years. 反驳解释 : (C) Evidence suggests that inhalers make the lungs more sensitive to : irritation by airborne pollen. 支持论点 : (D) By temporarily relieving the symptoms of asthma, inhalers encourage : sufferers to avoid more beneficial measures. 支持论点 : (E) Ten years ago bronchial inhalers were not available as an asthma treatment. 支持论点 : Answer: A : 79. Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? : (A) Urban pollution has not doubled in the past decade. 无关 : (B) Doctors and patients generally ignore the role of allergies in asthma. 无关 : (C) Bronchial inhalers are unsafe, even when used according to the : recommended instructions. 不像是assumption 像support : (D) The use of bronchial inhalers aggravates other diseases that : frequently occur among asthma sufferers and that often lead to fatal : outcomes even when the asthma itself does not. 比较不像是assumption 比较像是support : (E) Increased urban pollution, improved recording of asthma deaths, : and the used of asthma deaths, and the use of bronchial inhalers are the : only possible explanations of the increased death rate due to asthma. 假设就只有这几个原因 不会天外飞来一个"另有他因" 所以反驳完explanations就ok : Answer: E 这是我的看法 欢迎指教 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 219.70.208.217 ※ 编辑: Anero 来自: 219.70.208.217 (12/16 18:14)