我的想法是這樣: 題目是在問這個結論的前提假設是啥 不是在問結論本身 所以你只能就題目給的結論去找出跟這結論有相關的東西 其餘不相干的就不要弄進來 D提到的內容(可以把照片當做corroborative evidence等等)是多餘的 因為在題目的結論 中 根本沒提到這點 既然都沒扯到關於額外的證據等等資訊 為何假設會有? 題目的結論只說到 照片的sense都會有錯誤 所以nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph. 所以你只能就五個答案中 找出與這結論完全有關的選項 不要去做其他過度的推論 也不要誤把假設, 前提等 當做結論來選 如此 就知道A這選項是最正確的了 ※ 引述《PINKENVI (是一條不歸路)》之銘言： : 82. Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits : hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could : always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot : express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing : can ever be definitively proved with a photograph. : Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion : above to be properly drawn? : A. Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth : cannot furnish definitive proof. : B. The whole truth cannot be known. : C. It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph : in any sense. : D. It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence : if there isadditional evidence establishing the truth about the scene : photographed. : E、If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove : definitively the truth about it : 恩。我現在在(A)和(D)之間掙扎。 : 答案是(A) : 這是assumption，大部分這類問題都是要取非。但是，如果D要從哪裡取非? : 那又要如何反駁題目?題目也是要取非嗎? : 我不太懂。請各位幫忙一下這類ASSUMPTION問題。 : 謝謝! -- No doubt, just keep walking --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.168.74.96