我的想法是这样: 题目是在问这个结论的前提假设是啥 不是在问结论本身 所以你只能就题目给的结论去找出跟这结论有相关的东西 其余不相干的就不要弄进来 D提到的内容(可以把照片当做corroborative evidence等等)是多余的 因为在题目的结论 中 根本没提到这点 既然都没扯到关於额外的证据等等资讯 为何假设会有? 题目的结论只说到 照片的sense都会有错误 所以nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph. 所以你只能就五个答案中 找出与这结论完全有关的选项 不要去做其他过度的推论 也不要误把假设, 前提等 当做结论来选 如此 就知道A这选项是最正确的了 ※ 引述《PINKENVI (是一条不归路)》之铭言： : 82. Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits : hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could : always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot : express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing : can ever be definitively proved with a photograph. : Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion : above to be properly drawn? : A. Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth : cannot furnish definitive proof. : B. The whole truth cannot be known. : C. It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph : in any sense. : D. It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence : if there isadditional evidence establishing the truth about the scene : photographed. : E、If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove : definitively the truth about it : 恩。我现在在(A)和(D)之间挣扎。 : 答案是(A) : 这是assumption，大部分这类问题都是要取非。但是，如果D要从哪里取非? : 那又要如何反驳题目?题目也是要取非吗? : 我不太懂。请各位帮忙一下这类ASSUMPTION问题。 : 谢谢! -- No doubt, just keep walking --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.168.74.96