來自打嘴巴一下~ 才講完我就看到我眼前的文章出現一句: The vesicles targeted by this motif were not lysosomes but instead were early endosomes coincidient with endocytosed CpG DNA. 而且這句中間根本沒有插入句呢！ 沒有平衡對象認同的問題。 所以...其實是有這個與法規則存在的嘛？ 當N. 作為S.C.時，就有 S. + beV + not + N. (S.C.), but (instead) + beV + N. (S.C.) 這項語法規則存在??? 待討論，我沒找到夠多的例子... ※ 引述《cckjenius (gogogo~~~)》之銘言： : (原文恕刪) : 74. (28503-!-item-!-188;#058&003635) : Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are : not the products of natural selection,favored : ( due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival,but that they are) : simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments. : (A) due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are : (B) due to the reproduction or survival they enhance, but they are : (C) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but : (D) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but are : (E) because of enhancing reproduction or survival, but are : 這題我乍看也會想選 D, 因為 that子句中的 are not..., but are... : 但是再看一遍之後，我比較同意原po的說法， : 1) not..., but... 平衡！！ : 所以 not + N, but 後面也要直接加 N. : 2) 而且"逗點" 也是一個線索，如果是because子句中的兩個動詞並列, : 那麼在but前面不能有逗點, 逗點表示把favored之後的插入句隔出來 : 3) 如果說是 reproduction(N1) or survival(N2), but N3 的三名詞並列， : 就更說不通了, 名詞並列不可能有or又有but --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.109.40.42