来自打嘴巴一下~ 才讲完我就看到我眼前的文章出现一句: The vesicles targeted by this motif were not lysosomes but instead were early endosomes coincidient with endocytosed CpG DNA. 而且这句中间根本没有插入句呢！ 没有平衡对象认同的问题。 所以...其实是有这个与法规则存在的嘛？ 当N. 作为S.C.时，就有 S. + beV + not + N. (S.C.), but (instead) + beV + N. (S.C.) 这项语法规则存在??? 待讨论，我没找到够多的例子... ※ 引述《cckjenius (gogogo~~~)》之铭言： : (原文恕删) : 74. (28503-!-item-!-188;#058&003635) : Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are : not the products of natural selection,favored : ( due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival,but that they are) : simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments. : (A) due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are : (B) due to the reproduction or survival they enhance, but they are : (C) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but : (D) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but are : (E) because of enhancing reproduction or survival, but are : 这题我乍看也会想选 D, 因为 that子句中的 are not..., but are... : 但是再看一遍之後，我比较同意原po的说法， : 1) not..., but... 平衡！！ : 所以 not + N, but 後面也要直接加 N. : 2) 而且"逗点" 也是一个线索，如果是because子句中的两个动词并列, : 那麽在but前面不能有逗点, 逗点表示把favored之後的插入句隔出来 : 3) 如果说是 reproduction(N1) or survival(N2), but N3 的三名词并列， : 就更说不通了, 名词并列不可能有or又有but --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.109.40.42