※ 引述《Jinai (橘子汽水好喝~)》之銘言： 題目~ (稍微排一下板，原文看了不太清楚 XD ) 73. There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific findings, namely, the replication of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientists, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results. Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument? 我覺得本文的結論句是紅色的部分~因為看不太懂原文，所以用壓寶的方式解~ 1.本文答案的重點應該在 experiments上~ 2.本文答案應該會出現比較positive的內容 (A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated. 有應該要出現的重點字 且內容為正面屬性的字眼，保留~ (B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication. 雖然有work，但most會產生樣本不具代表性，且本文未提到publication (C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication. most會產生樣本不具代表性，且本文未提到pressure (D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud. 雖然有提到experiments，但應該和比較內容無關 (E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone. most會產生樣本不具代表性，且和比較內容無關 所以選A XD 請指教~ : 答案是(A) : 請問大家如何解此題 謝謝 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.231.51.80 ※ 編輯: zhin 來自: 61.231.51.80 (10/28 22:18)