※ 引述《Jinai (橘子汽水好喝~)》之铭言： 题目~ (稍微排一下板，原文看了不太清楚 XD ) 73. There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific findings, namely, the replication of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientists, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results. Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument? 我觉得本文的结论句是红色的部分~因为看不太懂原文，所以用压宝的方式解~ 1.本文答案的重点应该在 experiments上~ 2.本文答案应该会出现比较positive的内容 (A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated. 有应该要出现的重点字 且内容为正面属性的字眼，保留~ (B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication. 虽然有work，但most会产生样本不具代表性，且本文未提到publication (C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication. most会产生样本不具代表性，且本文未提到pressure (D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud. 虽然有提到experiments，但应该和比较内容无关 (E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone. most会产生样本不具代表性，且和比较内容无关 所以选A XD 请指教~ : 答案是(A) : 请问大家如何解此题 谢谢 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.231.51.80 ※ 编辑: zhin 来自: 61.231.51.80 (10/28 22:18)