看到都沒有人回... 所以翻一下意思而已, 有錯誤請別的網友指正 ※ 引述《hob (森林裡的魚)》之銘言： : During the 1980s and the early 1990s, postmodernist scholarship was highly : influential in Anglo-American academia; at the same time, African American, : lesbian, and other critics of earlier feminism were, often rightly, critiquing : it for ignoring their needs, interests, and perspectives. 1980後期和1990年初, 後現代主義在美國學界有很大的影響, 在同時, 黑人, 女同志和其它早期女性主義的批評者也批評女性主義忽略了他們的觀點和需求 The feminist : antiessentialist critique that often combined the two was at times carried to : the extreme of asserting tat no generalizations at all could or should be made : about women, gender, mothering , or many other topics that some femenists : thought it was still important to be able to discuss. 女性主義的反本質論一派是集合上面兩者者的觀點, 並且常常把它推到極玫認為 對於女人, 女性, 母質, 或其它女性者認為仍然重要的議題, 都不能有任可的 結論 (generalization) In addition, it was : sometimes claimed that, whatever the quality of the evidence presented or the : strength of the argument made, the suggestion by any white, middle-class : feminist that women and girls in cultures other than our own are disadvantaged : or oppressed by elements of their own cultures amounted to offensive cultural : imperialism. 此外, 也有批評指出, 不管白人, 中產階級的女性主義主義者的論點是否有憑證 和立量, 他們總是暗指其他文化的女人一定受到壓迫, 這樣的女性主義也等同於 文化帝國主義 After reading or experience these critiques, many have felt more : than somewhat inhibited about writing anything, especially about Third World : women, that was not entirely contextualized and localized in its focus. 在讀完這總總的批評之後, 很多人覺得很難提筆再寫什麼, 尤其是寫關於第三世界 國家的女性, 而沒有完全根基和侷限於自己的視野 : ※ 引述《wangning (首席靈媒)》之銘言： : : 我覺得妳這裡有點小錯亂耶 : : 我在想,依常理判斷的話 : : 它指的應該是說 : : 後現代女性主義批評上述的essentialists,覺得她們自以為"除了中產階級 : : 白人所處的文化外,任何文化都是壓迫女性的" : : 所以批評者才會覺得這些essentialists,是忽略差異,且文化帝國的 : : 如果是降子解讀的話,下面幾句"很少去碰第三世界女性的遭遇那一塊" : : 也許有不同的意思 : : 或者妳把原文打一打:p看有沒有功力很高的人可以直接幫妳看啊, : : 比我們在這裡亂猜好 --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 152.3.233.25