看到都没有人回... 所以翻一下意思而已, 有错误请别的网友指正 ※ 引述《hob (森林里的鱼)》之铭言： : During the 1980s and the early 1990s, postmodernist scholarship was highly : influential in Anglo-American academia; at the same time, African American, : lesbian, and other critics of earlier feminism were, often rightly, critiquing : it for ignoring their needs, interests, and perspectives. 1980後期和1990年初, 後现代主义在美国学界有很大的影响, 在同时, 黑人, 女同志和其它早期女性主义的批评者也批评女性主义忽略了他们的观点和需求 The feminist : antiessentialist critique that often combined the two was at times carried to : the extreme of asserting tat no generalizations at all could or should be made : about women, gender, mothering , or many other topics that some femenists : thought it was still important to be able to discuss. 女性主义的反本质论一派是集合上面两者者的观点, 并且常常把它推到极玫认为 对於女人, 女性, 母质, 或其它女性者认为仍然重要的议题, 都不能有任可的 结论 (generalization) In addition, it was : sometimes claimed that, whatever the quality of the evidence presented or the : strength of the argument made, the suggestion by any white, middle-class : feminist that women and girls in cultures other than our own are disadvantaged : or oppressed by elements of their own cultures amounted to offensive cultural : imperialism. 此外, 也有批评指出, 不管白人, 中产阶级的女性主义主义者的论点是否有凭证 和立量, 他们总是暗指其他文化的女人一定受到压迫, 这样的女性主义也等同於 文化帝国主义 After reading or experience these critiques, many have felt more : than somewhat inhibited about writing anything, especially about Third World : women, that was not entirely contextualized and localized in its focus. 在读完这总总的批评之後, 很多人觉得很难提笔再写什麽, 尤其是写关於第三世界 国家的女性, 而没有完全根基和局限於自己的视野 : ※ 引述《wangning (首席灵媒)》之铭言： : : 我觉得你这里有点小错乱耶 : : 我在想,依常理判断的话 : : 它指的应该是说 : : 後现代女性主义批评上述的essentialists,觉得她们自以为"除了中产阶级 : : 白人所处的文化外,任何文化都是压迫女性的" : : 所以批评者才会觉得这些essentialists,是忽略差异,且文化帝国的 : : 如果是降子解读的话,下面几句"很少去碰第三世界女性的遭遇那一块" : : 也许有不同的意思 : : 或者你把原文打一打:p看有没有功力很高的人可以直接帮你看啊, : : 比我们在这里乱猜好 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 152.3.233.25