作者Hauze (Mental Endurance)
看板EuropeanCar
標題Re: 小車撞擊測試和大車的標準不同
時間Thu Feb 1 00:21:14 2007
補充一下
http://www.euroncap.com/content/answers/faqs.php
20. Are large cars safer than small cars?
In frontal impacts between cars, the occupants of the heavier car or the
one with higher structures tend to fare better than those travelling in
lighter lower cars. It should be noted though that higher vehicles tend to be
less stable and consequently more likely to be involved in accidents,
particularly those involving loss of control, where overturning or an impact
with a roadside obstacle may occur. These effects are currently impossible to
overcome. As most people decide on the size of the car to buy for other
reasons, Euro NCAP only makes comparisons within size categories. The rating
of a car within its size category is a function of the quality of its safety
design.
21. Can results be compared between different categories of cars?
No. Results should only be compared within the same group. The frontal
testing method mirrors a crash between two similar sized cars. The Euro NCAP
tests cannot be used to predict the outcome of such crashes between cars of
different heights and masses.
模擬的是相似的車沒錯
但是他有說大車一定比小車安全嗎?
請看20 他說前撞情況下較重的車(請注意是重不是大)可能較佳
大小呢? 他說不同類別"不能比較"
希望這樣解決了一些疑惑
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.170.15.240
※ 編輯: Hauze 來自: 218.170.15.240 (02/01 00:24)
※ 編輯: Hauze 來自: 218.170.15.240 (02/01 00:24)
1F：推 reallocust:這網頁以前我倒是沒仔細看過,尤其是網頁拉這麼下面的內 02/01 00:46
2F：→ reallocust:容,可是通常一般說大車都比較重,所以...而且,不能比較 02/01 00:50
3F：→ reallocust:這4個字也有很多解讀方法 02/01 00:52
4F：→ reallocust:不過模擬用"相似的車"這和我看到BMW的官方說法有些類似 02/01 00:53
第21問是斬釘截鐵的 "No."
BMW應該部分正確
※ 編輯: Hauze 來自: 218.170.15.240 (02/01 01:08)
5F：推 reallocust:21的內容是說測試結果只能針對同一級距(the same group 02/01 01:37
6F：→ reallocust:),所以也沒法比較小車5顆星會否比大車4顆星安全 02/01 01:38
7F：→ reallocust:如果再看了BMW官方說法與美國iihs的測試,我個人...會傾 02/01 01:40
8F：→ reallocust:向相信大車比較安全(純個人思維) 02/01 01:41