作者Hauze (Mental Endurance)
看板EuropeanCar
标题Re: 小车撞击测试和大车的标准不同
时间Thu Feb 1 00:21:14 2007
补充一下
http://www.euroncap.com/content/answers/faqs.php
20. Are large cars safer than small cars?
In frontal impacts between cars, the occupants of the heavier car or the
one with higher structures tend to fare better than those travelling in
lighter lower cars. It should be noted though that higher vehicles tend to be
less stable and consequently more likely to be involved in accidents,
particularly those involving loss of control, where overturning or an impact
with a roadside obstacle may occur. These effects are currently impossible to
overcome. As most people decide on the size of the car to buy for other
reasons, Euro NCAP only makes comparisons within size categories. The rating
of a car within its size category is a function of the quality of its safety
design.
21. Can results be compared between different categories of cars?
No. Results should only be compared within the same group. The frontal
testing method mirrors a crash between two similar sized cars. The Euro NCAP
tests cannot be used to predict the outcome of such crashes between cars of
different heights and masses.
模拟的是相似的车没错
但是他有说大车一定比小车安全吗?
请看20 他说前撞情况下较重的车(请注意是重不是大)可能较佳
大小呢? 他说不同类别"不能比较"
希望这样解决了一些疑惑
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.170.15.240
※ 编辑: Hauze 来自: 218.170.15.240 (02/01 00:24)
※ 编辑: Hauze 来自: 218.170.15.240 (02/01 00:24)
1F：推 reallocust:这网页以前我倒是没仔细看过,尤其是网页拉这麽下面的内 02/01 00:46
2F：→ reallocust:容,可是通常一般说大车都比较重,所以...而且,不能比较 02/01 00:50
3F：→ reallocust:这4个字也有很多解读方法 02/01 00:52
4F：→ reallocust:不过模拟用"相似的车"这和我看到BMW的官方说法有些类似 02/01 00:53
第21问是斩钉截铁的 "No."
BMW应该部分正确
※ 编辑: Hauze 来自: 218.170.15.240 (02/01 01:08)
5F：推 reallocust:21的内容是说测试结果只能针对同一级距(the same group 02/01 01:37
6F：→ reallocust:),所以也没法比较小车5颗星会否比大车4颗星安全 02/01 01:38
7F：→ reallocust:如果再看了BMW官方说法与美国iihs的测试,我个人...会倾 02/01 01:40
8F：→ reallocust:向相信大车比较安全(纯个人思维) 02/01 01:41