作者trtr112 (pk)
看板Eng-Class
標題[請益] were 改為 those 是否可以?
時間Wed May 3 11:03:27 2023
想請教各位先進,
Among the study participants over the age of 40, the sedentary were
almost twice as likely to die during the course of the study than
were participants who were highly active.
以上這個句子中, 第三行 participants 前面的 were 可以改為 those 嗎?
謝謝!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 125.230.78.11 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://webptt.com/m.aspx?n=bbs/Eng-Class/M.1683083009.A.E23.html
1F：推 Alphaplus: 我才疏學淺，我實在不知道為啥可以用were... 05/04 08:43
2F：→ Alphaplus: 坐等大神解析 05/04 08:44
3F：→ trtr112: 這題確實有點疑惑! 05/04 21:42
4F：→ jamiejian: 原句:the sedentary were almost as likely to die 05/07 18:23
5F：→ jamiejian: during the course of the study than the 05/07 18:24
6F：→ jamiejian: participants who were highly active were 05/07 18:25
7F：→ jamiejian: 因為副詞子句的主詞the participants帶有修飾語who 05/07 18:27
8F：→ jamiejian: were highly active，所以會將子句裡的動詞were倒裝移 05/07 18:28
9F：→ jamiejian: 到the participants之前 05/07 18:29
10F：→ jamiejian: 你所謂的改成those只是將the participants改成those 05/07 18:32
11F：→ jamiejian: participants，然後將子句的動詞were做省略 05/07 18:33
12F：→ jamiejian: 所以並不是those和were只能二擇一 05/07 18:34
13F：→ jamiejian: were在這裡會選擇倒裝是因為帶有修飾語的主詞太長了 05/07 18:37
14F：→ trtr112: 請問j大, 那是說用 those 也可以嗎?但只是無倒裝, 對嗎? 05/08 22:13
15F：→ jamiejian: 是的 05/09 18:08
16F：→ peter98: 是 但是用those的話 後面participants就不要了 寫了 05/21 22:06
17F：→ peter98: 也可以 但通常就是贅字一枚而已 05/21 22:06