作者kokos (哈)
看板Eng-Class
標題Re: [求譯] CNN Student News - July 27, 2011
時間Sat Jul 30 21:58:19 2011
※ 引述《masokucha1 (葵)》之銘言：
: [出處]:CNN Student News: Summer Show - July 27, 2011
: [說明]:這集在講美國債務上限的問題，如果有看過的可以幫我解答一下嗎＠＠？
: [原文]: It's unlikely that the government would give just a few programs all the
: money they needed and let others go without anything. The Treasury Department
: would probably spread a thin amount of the money it had over a lot of
: different areas, giving some programs maybe just enough to operate. But it
: illustrates two things. One: How much more the government spends than it
: takes in?...
: (transcrip的倒數第二段)
: [問題]: 就是最後一句:How much more the government spends than it
: takes in?
: 我覺得我是卡在不懂take in在這裡是什麼意思.....
我剛剛也看了這篇
不過我跟原PO的問題不一樣
我想問的也是同一段
And two: Why many people in the government want that debt ceiling to be
raised so badly, so the government can continue borrowing the money it needs
to pay for all of its programs in full.
剛好接在原PO後面，這邊他說的badly是指說
1.政府人員不希望debt ceiling不要上升
還是
2.政府人員希望debt ceiling上升，不要像現在這樣糟糕?
因為我原本的想法是1
但是後面的文意，讓我覺得1好像是錯的
謝謝大大幫忙
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.227.98.10
1F：推 fonya:希望公債上限(debt ceiling)上升到如此糟糕的程度 07/30 22:33
2F：→ fonya:所以不是1也不是2。 07/30 22:33
3F：→ fonya:完整的解釋是：為什麼政府裡有那麼多人希望提高公債上限 07/30 22:34
4F：→ fonya:到如此糟糕的程度，使得政府可以完整地繼續借到它所有計畫 07/30 22:38
5F：→ fonya:所需的錢。 07/30 22:38
6F：→ fonya:因為使得公債比例這麼高對國家財政是非常大的負擔 07/30 22:40
7F：→ fonya:幾乎可說是以債養債了，所以說raised so badly 07/30 22:41
9F：→ dunchee:-> 7 .... (另外也看Thesaurus部份的 6->特別是最後一個例 07/30 23:23
10F：→ dunchee:句 note:這裡的so bad: 07/30 23:24
12F：→ dunchee:-> US, informal : badly 07/30 23:25
13F：→ kokos:瞭解了 ~ 原來完全誤解了 謝謝幫忙 ^^ 07/31 09:46