作者yyuweii (唯)
看板Eng-Class
標題[文法]高中文法
時間Fri Jun 18 16:40:08 2010
1. I think the space program is too expensive and ___
we can't afford it.
(A)X (B)because (C)that (D)unless
A:(C) 為什麼不能選(A)?
2. Many other vessels have been lost in this region,
which included navy ship, Nereus.
which included有錯嗎?
為什麼which included 要改成 including?
可以改成of which included嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.255.47.37
1F：→ noruas:I think that... and that..... 06/18 16:41
2F：→ noruas:(二句都是that子句~) 06/18 16:42
3F：→ noruas:2. which 指的是 this region 06/18 16:43
4F：推 noruas:要改成 including 06/18 16:45
5F：→ noruas:This region included navy ship, Nereus. 這樣說不對 06/18 16:47
6F：→ noruas:Many other vessels included navy ship, Nereus. 才對 06/18 16:48
7F：→ noruas:(因為 navy ship 是屬於 Many other vessels) 06/18 16:48
8F：→ A1right:如果第一句要選A 那麼是不是把we去掉就好? 06/18 17:29
9F：→ A1right:I think.. expensive and can't afford it. Is it right? 06/18 17:31
10F：推 noruas:把we刪掉..變成the space program can't afford it 06/18 18:10
11F：→ noruas:(太空計劃支付不起) 06/18 18:10
12F：→ noruas:正確講應該是"我們付不起".. (付錢的是人,而非太空計畫) 06/18 18:11
13F：→ dunchee:1. (A)比(C)更適當. 參考: 06/18 22:09
15F：→ dunchee:(特別是最後3個例子，或是直接查列在下方的出處) 06/18 22:10
16F：→ dunchee:2. "including"用的是這個的意思/用法(詞性): 06/18 22:13
18F：→ dunchee:這的用法來源"有可能"是來自關代用法(reduced relative 06/18 22:14
19F：→ dunchee:clause)，但是including這時後已經有自己的特定用法/意思 06/18 22:15
20F：→ dunchee:(比如前頭有人提到的，which included會是另外的意思) 06/18 22:16
21F：推 zofloya:第一題念過去就覺得A是比較好的答案，什麼鳥題目。還有辦 06/18 23:13
22F：→ zofloya:法解釋一堆，真的佩服你們。 06/18 23:14
23F：→ ashurali:including在LDOCE例句仍是和換成which include(s)相同吧 06/19 00:29
24F：→ ashurali:2.的which～不能說是對前面整句話作補充說明嗎？ 06/19 00:29
25F：推 rogerkid:推樓上~問題在於時態的不一致~而不是意義上有不同 06/19 11:55
26F：推 noruas:z大為什麼這樣講....不回答就算了,何必酸人 06/20 02:10
27F：→ noruas:難道Z大覺得大家程度太低 所以態度很不屑嗎? 06/20 02:11
28F：→ noruas:我覺得 學英文的過程中 難免要歷經一段慘痛期 06/20 02:13
29F：→ noruas:不管問題再怎麼沒意義 但還是得面對 06/20 02:14
30F：推 noruas:對於中級程度的問題,就用中級程度能理解的方式去回答 06/20 02:18
31F：→ noruas:而不是說"題目太爛 不用管它" 這種回答方式,只顯示出傲慢 06/20 02:20
32F：推 zofloya:很顯然我只針對對第一題"硬"合理化題目的人，不用把"大家" 06/20 12:23
33F：→ zofloya:扯進來 06/20 12:23
34F：→ zofloya:還有就是，"沒有意義"的問題，真的不需要面對，共勉之~ 06/20 12:27