Phil Jackson took a weird, veiled Twitter shot at Carmelo Anthony source: Adi Joseph , USA TODAY Sports Phil Jackson tweets are basically like James Joyce's writing. You need to unpack every word slowly, consider the connotations and use loose definitions of words to get the point. Take today's offering from the Knicks president - his first tweet since Dec. 27: https://twitter.com/PhilJackson11/status/829062793802420224 "Bleacher's Ding almost rings the bell, but I learned you don't change the spot on a leopard with Michael Graham in my CBA daze." 上面是某師的推特連結，內容就是上面那句話 早上看到這個差點沒被氣死 = = OK, let's translate this, phrase by phrase: OK，各位客官們，下面有詳細的說文解字，不想被我誤導請一字一句慢慢看XD 當然我把大意寫在最下面 Bleacher's Ding That's clearly a reference to Bleacher Report's Kevin Ding, who had a column today criticizing Carmelo Anthony for not fulfilling the role of a Phil Jackson Superstar (in other words, Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant). almost rings the bell, In other words, Jackson says Ding's column was pretty close to the truth. That in itself is a pretty harsh thing to say about your team's highest paid and highest-profile player. Ding's column, in no uncertain terms, says Anthony doesn't care about winning enough. But Jackson left himself some room with that "almost," right? but I learned you don't change the spot on a leopard Oh, nope. Phil's grievance isn't with the stuff about Anthony but rather the stuff about him. Here's the key sentence in question: "Jackson undoubtedly overestimated his own ability-perhaps you've heard something lately about the no-trade clause he gifted to Melo in 2014-to kindle Anthony's evolution from superstar to winning superstar." with Michael Graham in my CBA Graham was Patrick Ewing's co-star on those great 1980s Georgetown teams. He was a very talented power forward who didn't have enough discipline to make the NBA, but he did play for Jackson on the Albany Patroons. And he got dismissed midseason after fighting with Jackson during the game, as this Washingtonian profile of Graham now details. daze. This is hippy for "days." So what does Phil Jackson mean with all of this? He's trying to tell us that he knew he couldn't change Anthony, whom he gave a five-year near-maximum contract with a player option and a no-trade clause. That deal came after Anthony had played for Jackson for a year. Jackson also set Anthony up with teammates that didn't fit his playing style, and his persistent negativity surely hasn't helped matters. But these days, the goal seems to be getting Anthony to waive his no-trade clause - and ideally to get Kevin Love back in return. So maybe a public shot on Twitter is the right move. At the very least, it's something that happened 阿這篇就是某師又推了一篇想要逼甜瓜放棄條款的"具有侵略性的"推文，頗喝 反正這篇廢...阿..是推文!!! 的大意就是，有個記者叫丁丁( Bleacher Report's Kevin Ding) 他真的很棒開專欄說啥甜瓜不是禪師的菜(MJ、KB之流) 然後禪師就開推附和他"you got the point~!!! 阿我的感想就是，某師可能一開始就沒有沒打算圍著瓜打造冠軍陣容 (內文有寫道，君不見他找了一堆看起來不錯但根本不適合瓜的隊友， 應該就是想藉此逼他走，可是他萬萬沒想到我瓜臉皮那麼厚 顆顆 簡言之就是，他一開始可能為了博取瓜迷老闆的信任，硬著頭皮簽他不想簽的瓜 後來她又打算用他那套"逼你走人" 現在他踢到鐵板了，開始自己惱羞開始腦補&對媒體大放暗示 "那顆瓜根本不想贏，他直想待在紐約賴著不走 :( 開始要給嗜血的紐媒帶風向，一起打瓜 (某師森七七ZZZZZZ) 心得: 瓜留在這只是惹人嫌，我知道他想留，但 禪師根本就沒心幫你找人，你跟不適合的人搭打起來就是現在這個鳥樣 除非禪師先走，不然我建議瓜是多留一天都嫌浪費(除非他真的如禪師說的沒心奪 冠，但這個我不知道也不予置評 = =.) PS.小道消息，今天又在討論說瓜很適合曼菲斯 不過當地的記者好像不是很看好，直接推文上 SAY NO (謎之聲: 難不成要跟怕爽死。錢德勒換XDDDD) CP男領那麼多，我瓜領那麼多還要被說愛錢(瓜酸最不愛錢，最好都把錢捐出去 做善事好了 顆顆) . --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.187.167 ※ 文章網址: https://webptt.com/m.aspx?n=bbs/C_Anthony/M.1486516573.A.FEC.html