台灣橋友經常有特約不能詐叫的錯誤認知, 事實上, 除非該國或該區的橋協或是 主辦單位特別規定, 否則可不可以詐叫和是不是特約沒有關係。這方面最有名的 應該是 Zia Mahmood 的假控制力叫牌, 如果特約就不能詐叫的話, 他的橋監是 三百年也坐不完的罷! 有些地區, 例如 ACBL, 規定使用強的特約開叫不得詐叫, 但是其他的特約開叫, 如 Flannery 之類, 卻沒有禁止詐叫。[根據橋規, 信號 也是特約的一種, 相信那些主張特約不可以詐騙的人, 並不會在莊家拔 AK 時, 永遠規矩的把自己的張數跟出來。] 即使在國手級的橋手間仍有嚴重的對橋規認識不足, 這不能不說是橋協的過失。 橋規 40 條 A: 橋手可以隨意出牌或叫牌, 即使該叫品是蓄意誤導 (詐叫), 或做 特約叫品與常規不合, 或該搭檔所宣示者不合, 只要該行動不是 基於搭檔間的默契即可。 原文: A player may make any call or play (including an intentionally misleading call — such as a psychic bid — or a call or play that departs from commonly accepted, or previously announced, use of a convention), without prior announcement, provided that such call or play is not based on a partnership understanding. 橋規 73 條 E: 橋手可以用任何出牌或打牌來欺瞞對手, 只要不被隱藏的默契或 經驗所保護就好 [後面還有, 刪] 原文: A player may appropriately attempt to deceive an opponent through a call or play (so long as the deception is not protected by concealed partnership understanding or experience). [...] 橋規 75 條 B: 橋手可以違反宣示 (或未宣示) 的搭檔間約定, 只要同伴不知情 即可 (但經常性的違反約定會造成隱含的默契, 而這必需宣示)。 違反約定不需要通知對手, 而對手如果因此被誤導而受損, 也無 權獲償。 原文: A player may violate an announced partnership agreement, so long as his partner is unaware of the violation (but habitual violations within a partnership may create implicit agreements, which must be disclosed). No player has the obligation to disclose to the opponents that he has violated an announced agreement and if the opponents are subsequently damaged, as through drawing a false inference from such violation, they are not entitled to redress. -- ┌────────────────────────────────────┐ │「搭檔組隊, 一如交友: 相親易, 相信難, 相諒尤可貴。」... Ｃ. Ａ. ＰERROUX│ └────────────────────────────────────┘ ※ 編輯: terrorist 來自: 61.217.247.19 (05/24 13:37)