台湾桥友经常有特约不能诈叫的错误认知, 事实上, 除非该国或该区的桥协或是 主办单位特别规定, 否则可不可以诈叫和是不是特约没有关系。这方面最有名的 应该是 Zia Mahmood 的假控制力叫牌, 如果特约就不能诈叫的话, 他的桥监是 三百年也坐不完的罢! 有些地区, 例如 ACBL, 规定使用强的特约开叫不得诈叫, 但是其他的特约开叫, 如 Flannery 之类, 却没有禁止诈叫。[根据桥规, 信号 也是特约的一种, 相信那些主张特约不可以诈骗的人, 并不会在庄家拔 AK 时, 永远规矩的把自己的张数跟出来。] 即使在国手级的桥手间仍有严重的对桥规认识不足, 这不能不说是桥协的过失。 桥规 40 条 A: 桥手可以随意出牌或叫牌, 即使该叫品是蓄意误导 (诈叫), 或做 特约叫品与常规不合, 或该搭档所宣示者不合, 只要该行动不是 基於搭档间的默契即可。 原文: A player may make any call or play (including an intentionally misleading call — such as a psychic bid — or a call or play that departs from commonly accepted, or previously announced, use of a convention), without prior announcement, provided that such call or play is not based on a partnership understanding. 桥规 73 条 E: 桥手可以用任何出牌或打牌来欺瞒对手, 只要不被隐藏的默契或 经验所保护就好 [後面还有, 删] 原文: A player may appropriately attempt to deceive an opponent through a call or play (so long as the deception is not protected by concealed partnership understanding or experience). [...] 桥规 75 条 B: 桥手可以违反宣示 (或未宣示) 的搭档间约定, 只要同伴不知情 即可 (但经常性的违反约定会造成隐含的默契, 而这必需宣示)。 违反约定不需要通知对手, 而对手如果因此被误导而受损, 也无 权获偿。 原文: A player may violate an announced partnership agreement, so long as his partner is unaware of the violation (but habitual violations within a partnership may create implicit agreements, which must be disclosed). No player has the obligation to disclose to the opponents that he has violated an announced agreement and if the opponents are subsequently damaged, as through drawing a false inference from such violation, they are not entitled to redress. -- ┌────────────────────────────────────┐ │「搭档组队, 一如交友: 相亲易, 相信难, 相谅尤可贵。」... Ｃ. Ａ. ＰERROUX│ └────────────────────────────────────┘ ※ 编辑: terrorist 来自: 61.217.247.19 (05/24 13:37)