外電來自blazersedge 數據很長，所以我分三篇發好了，這篇是pace及offence。 Since Dallas will provide the first-round playoff opposition for the Trail Blazers this year we're starting the proceedings with a comparative look at the two teams statistically. Caveat: Some of these numbers reflect games through April 12th. The Dallas-New Orleans and Portland-Golden State games were not factored in to these categories. The difference will be negligible 小牛與阿拓的賽季數據比較，並沒有算上兩隊的最後一場。 PACE │ Mavericks │ Blazers ──┼──────┼────── Pace│ 93.4 (18th)│ 90.4 (30th) The Blazers play a low-pace, possession-oriented game. Everybody knows that. The Mavs do play faster and looser but the stylistic clash is not extreme. The Mavs aren't the Warriors or Knicks. They'll push but they'll not overwhelm the Blazers with speed. 大家都知道阿拓是慢節奏，主要打回合戰。小牛節奏較快且機遇戰多，但並不是像勇士 或尼克那種會把阿拓打垮的極端節奏。 OFFENSE 1.得分 │ Fast Break │ Points │ Offensive │ Points │ Points │ in Paint │ Efficiency ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼────── Mavericks│100.0 (13th)│ 14.4 (11th)│ 36.7 (29th)│ 106.4 (8th) ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼────── Blazers │ 96.3 (23rd)│ 10.0 (29th)│ 40.9 (18th)│ 105.2 (10th) ───┴──────┴──────┴──────┴────── 2.出手命中 Field Goals│ Field Goal │ Field Goal │ │ Made │ Attempts │ Percentage │ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Mavericks│ 37.4 (13th)│ 78.8 (24th)│ 47.4% (5th)│ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Blazers │ 36.1 (25th)│ 80.5 (19th)│44.9% (24th)│ ───┴──────┴──────┴──────┴ 3.三分出手命中 Three-Point│ Three-Point│ Three-Point│ │ Made │ Attempts │ Percentage │ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Mavericks│ 7.8 (8th) │ 21.5 (5th))│36.4% (11th)│ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Blazers │ 6.3 (14th)│ 18.2 (12th)│34.1% (23rd)│ ───┴──────┴──────┴──────┴ 4.罰球出手命中 Free Throws│ Free Throws│ Free Throws│ │ Made │ Attempts │ Percentage │ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Mavericks│ 17.4 (26th)│ 22.4 (27th)│77.6% (7th)│ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Blazers │ 17.9 (18th)│ 22.3 (28th)│80.4% (3rd)│ ───┴──────┴──────┴──────┴ 5.命中加乘 Effective │ True │ │ FG% │ Shooting % │ ───┼──────┼──────┼ Mavericks│ 52.4% (4th)│ 56.3% (4th)│ ───┼──────┼──────┼ Blazers │ 48.7%(22nd)│ 53.4%(19th)│ ───┴──────┴──────┴ This runs about as you would expect. Dallas scores more overall, scores more on the break, shoots and hits a bunch of jumpers. They trade far more heavily on threes and shoot them far more successfully than the Blazers do. They hold large advantages in Field Goal Percentage, Effective Field Goal Percentage, and True Shooting Percentage, the latter of which cannot be overcome by Portland's slight advantage from the foul line. The Blazers make bank in the paint. They also depend on getting up more shots to make up for their lack of distance shooting and overall percentage. Dallas will have the advantage if the game is pretty and contact-free. Portland will have the advantage if it gets gritty and depends on brute force. The onus is on the Blazers to force the Mavericks out of their game because Portland won't come close to winning in a straight-up shooting contest. 小牛得分多，快攻及投籃分數也較多。依賴三分投射但命中率也比阿拓好得多。 在FG%, Effective FG, 整體命中率, 以及True Shooting%的部份，都名列前矛。 而罰球數則是半斤八兩地糟。 阿拓部份，point in the paint較多，且依賴更多的出手數來彌補貧乏的投射命中。 小牛要發揮優勢得將比賽打得流暢並減少碰撞，反之阿拓要贏，得打得更侵略更肉博。 如果要跟小牛比跳投是穩死無疑的。 -- ◥◣ ◢◣ Ｂｌａｚｅｒｓ◥██◣ ◣ ＲＩＳＥ ★ ＷＩＴＨ ★ ＵＳ █◣ ◤ ◤ ◢█◣ ▋ █ █ ◢█◣ ◢█◣ █◥◣ ◢ ◢ █ ◤ ▋ ◢◤ ◢██ ◥█◤ ◤ ◣ ◥█◤ ◥ ◤ ◥ ◤ ◤ ◆ █ █ ◤ ▍▌▋ ◥◣ ◤ ◤ ◤ ◢ █ ◣▼◢ ◆ ◆ ◢ ◥◣█ █ ◢ ◢ ▋ █ ◢ ◢ ◢◢ █ █ ◤▼◥ ◢ ◣ ◢ ◣ ◤ ◥◤ ◤ ◥█◤ ◥◤◢◤ ◥◤█ █◤ ◥◤◥ ◢ ◣ ◥█◤ ◥█◤ --

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 125.227.198.25 ※ 編輯: JerrydBatum 來自: 125.227.198.25 (04/15 02:17) ※ mike200293:轉錄至看板 Mavericks 04/15 09:43