外电来自blazersedge 数据很长，所以我分三篇发好了，这篇是pace及offence。 Since Dallas will provide the first-round playoff opposition for the Trail Blazers this year we're starting the proceedings with a comparative look at the two teams statistically. Caveat: Some of these numbers reflect games through April 12th. The Dallas-New Orleans and Portland-Golden State games were not factored in to these categories. The difference will be negligible 小牛与阿拓的赛季数据比较，并没有算上两队的最後一场。 PACE │ Mavericks │ Blazers ──┼──────┼────── Pace│ 93.4 (18th)│ 90.4 (30th) The Blazers play a low-pace, possession-oriented game. Everybody knows that. The Mavs do play faster and looser but the stylistic clash is not extreme. The Mavs aren't the Warriors or Knicks. They'll push but they'll not overwhelm the Blazers with speed. 大家都知道阿拓是慢节奏，主要打回合战。小牛节奏较快且机遇战多，但并不是像勇士 或尼克那种会把阿拓打垮的极端节奏。 OFFENSE 1.得分 │ Fast Break │ Points │ Offensive │ Points │ Points │ in Paint │ Efficiency ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼────── Mavericks│100.0 (13th)│ 14.4 (11th)│ 36.7 (29th)│ 106.4 (8th) ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼────── Blazers │ 96.3 (23rd)│ 10.0 (29th)│ 40.9 (18th)│ 105.2 (10th) ───┴──────┴──────┴──────┴────── 2.出手命中 Field Goals│ Field Goal │ Field Goal │ │ Made │ Attempts │ Percentage │ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Mavericks│ 37.4 (13th)│ 78.8 (24th)│ 47.4% (5th)│ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Blazers │ 36.1 (25th)│ 80.5 (19th)│44.9% (24th)│ ───┴──────┴──────┴──────┴ 3.三分出手命中 Three-Point│ Three-Point│ Three-Point│ │ Made │ Attempts │ Percentage │ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Mavericks│ 7.8 (8th) │ 21.5 (5th))│36.4% (11th)│ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Blazers │ 6.3 (14th)│ 18.2 (12th)│34.1% (23rd)│ ───┴──────┴──────┴──────┴ 4.罚球出手命中 Free Throws│ Free Throws│ Free Throws│ │ Made │ Attempts │ Percentage │ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Mavericks│ 17.4 (26th)│ 22.4 (27th)│77.6% (7th)│ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Blazers │ 17.9 (18th)│ 22.3 (28th)│80.4% (3rd)│ ───┴──────┴──────┴──────┴ 5.命中加乘 Effective │ True │ │ FG% │ Shooting % │ ───┼──────┼──────┼ Mavericks│ 52.4% (4th)│ 56.3% (4th)│ ───┼──────┼──────┼ Blazers │ 48.7%(22nd)│ 53.4%(19th)│ ───┴──────┴──────┴ This runs about as you would expect. Dallas scores more overall, scores more on the break, shoots and hits a bunch of jumpers. They trade far more heavily on threes and shoot them far more successfully than the Blazers do. They hold large advantages in Field Goal Percentage, Effective Field Goal Percentage, and True Shooting Percentage, the latter of which cannot be overcome by Portland's slight advantage from the foul line. The Blazers make bank in the paint. They also depend on getting up more shots to make up for their lack of distance shooting and overall percentage. Dallas will have the advantage if the game is pretty and contact-free. Portland will have the advantage if it gets gritty and depends on brute force. The onus is on the Blazers to force the Mavericks out of their game because Portland won't come close to winning in a straight-up shooting contest. 小牛得分多，快攻及投篮分数也较多。依赖三分投射但命中率也比阿拓好得多。 在FG%, Effective FG, 整体命中率, 以及True Shooting%的部份，都名列前矛。 而罚球数则是半斤八两地糟。 阿拓部份，point in the paint较多，且依赖更多的出手数来弥补贫乏的投射命中。 小牛要发挥优势得将比赛打得流畅并减少碰撞，反之阿拓要赢，得打得更侵略更肉博。 如果要跟小牛比跳投是稳死无疑的。 -- ◥◣ ◢◣ Ｂｌａｚｅｒｓ◥██◣ ◣ ＲＩＳＥ ★ ＷＩＴＨ ★ ＵＳ █◣ ◤ ◤ ◢█◣ ▋ █ █ ◢█◣ ◢█◣ █◥◣ ◢ ◢ █ ◤ ▋ ◢◤ ◢██ ◥█◤ ◤ ◣ ◥█◤ ◥ ◤ ◥ ◤ ◤ ◆ █ █ ◤ ▍▌▋ ◥◣ ◤ ◤ ◤ ◢ █ ◣▼◢ ◆ ◆ ◢ ◥◣█ █ ◢ ◢ ▋ █ ◢ ◢ ◢◢ █ █ ◤▼◥ ◢ ◣ ◢ ◣ ◤ ◥◤ ◤ ◥█◤ ◥◤◢◤ ◥◤█ █◤ ◥◤◥ ◢ ◣ ◥█◤ ◥█◤ --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 125.227.198.25 ※ 编辑: JerrydBatum 来自: 125.227.198.25 (04/15 02:17) ※ mike200293:转录至看板 Mavericks 04/15 09:43