AfterPhD 板


LINE

Please respond to the following points: (Place an X on the line in front of your response.) 1. Quality of technical content ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 1a. novelty ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 1b. value ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 1c. rigor ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 1d. sufficiency of examples ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 1e. cogency ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 2. Clarity of presentation ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 2a. clarity of abstract ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 2b. abstract & paper consistency ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 2c. introduction of subject V Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3. Presentation V Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3a. organization & length V Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3b. expression of English ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3c. quality of diagrams/captions ___ Excellent ___ Good V Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3d. appropriate key words ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3e. editorial consistency (xrefs) ___ Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3f. bibliography format ___ Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 4. References to previous works ___ Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 5. Is a significant problem area addressed? Remarks: 6. Interest to DSP readers (check one - see http://www.elsevier.com/locate/dsp): ___ of great interest to most readers ___ of great interest to a few readers ___ of interest to most readers ___ of little interest to any reader 7. Does the paper contribute (check all that apply): ___ new principles ___ new results ___ valuable review or tutorial treatment ___ other valuable contribution to the subject ___ improved understanding 8. Recommendations (check one): ___ the manuscript should be published in Digital Signal Processing (likely to bring credit to DSP) ___ the manuscript should be published after minor revisions indicated below ___ the manuscript requires major revisions before publication ___ the manuscript should be submitted to another journal, such as ______________________________ ___ the manuscript should not be published (likely to downgrade the status of DSP) Please note that your recommendation and reviewer report are expected to cover the Highlights and Graphical Abstract if submitted with the manuscript. 9. Confidential recommendations for the Editors (please use additional page if needed): --



※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.164.95.29
※ 文章網址: https://webptt.com/m.aspx?n=bbs/AfterPhD/M.1489339814.A.EE2.html







like.gif 您可能會有興趣的文章
icon.png[問題/行為] 貓晚上進房間會不會有憋尿問題
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] 選了錯誤的女孩成為魔法少女 XDDDDDDDDDD
icon.png[正妹] 瑞典 一張
icon.png[心得] EMS高領長版毛衣.墨小樓MC1002
icon.png[分享] 丹龍隔熱紙GE55+33+22
icon.png[問題] 清洗洗衣機
icon.png[尋物] 窗台下的空間
icon.png[閒聊] 双極の女神1 木魔爵
icon.png[售車] 新竹 1997 march 1297cc 白色 四門
icon.png[討論] 能從照片感受到攝影者心情嗎
icon.png[狂賀] 賀賀賀賀 賀!島村卯月!總選舉NO.1
icon.png[難過] 羨慕白皮膚的女生
icon.png閱讀文章
icon.png[黑特]
icon.png[問題] SBK S1安裝於安全帽位置
icon.png[分享] 舊woo100絕版開箱!!
icon.pngRe: [無言] 關於小包衛生紙
icon.png[開箱] E5-2683V3 RX480Strix 快睿C1 簡單測試
icon.png[心得] 蒼の海賊龍 地獄 執行者16PT
icon.png[售車] 1999年Virage iO 1.8EXi
icon.png[心得] 挑戰33 LV10 獅子座pt solo
icon.png[閒聊] 手把手教你不被桶之新手主購教學
icon.png[分享] Civic Type R 量產版官方照無預警流出
icon.png[售車] Golf 4 2.0 銀色 自排
icon.png[出售] Graco提籃汽座(有底座)2000元誠可議
icon.png[問題] 請問補牙材質掉了還能再補嗎?(台中半年內
icon.png[問題] 44th 單曲 生寫竟然都給重複的啊啊!
icon.png[心得] 華南紅卡/icash 核卡
icon.png[問題] 拔牙矯正這樣正常嗎
icon.png[贈送] 老莫高業 初業 102年版
icon.png[情報] 三大行動支付 本季掀戰火
icon.png[寶寶] 博客來Amos水蠟筆5/1特價五折
icon.pngRe: [心得] 新鮮人一些面試分享
icon.png[心得] 蒼の海賊龍 地獄 麒麟25PT
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] (君の名は。雷慎入) 君名二創漫畫翻譯
icon.pngRe: [閒聊] OGN中場影片:失蹤人口局 (英文字幕)
icon.png[問題] 台灣大哥大4G訊號差
icon.png[出售] [全國]全新千尋侘草LED燈, 水草

請輸入看板名稱,例如:Boy-Girl站內搜尋

TOP