AfterPhD 板


LINE

Please respond to the following points: (Place an X on the line in front of your response.) 1. Quality of technical content ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 1a. novelty ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 1b. value ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 1c. rigor ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 1d. sufficiency of examples ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 1e. cogency ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 2. Clarity of presentation ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 2a. clarity of abstract ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 2b. abstract & paper consistency ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 2c. introduction of subject V Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3. Presentation V Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3a. organization & length V Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3b. expression of English ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3c. quality of diagrams/captions ___ Excellent ___ Good V Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3d. appropriate key words ___ Excellent V Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3e. editorial consistency (xrefs) ___ Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 3f. bibliography format ___ Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 4. References to previous works ___ Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor Remarks: 5. Is a significant problem area addressed? Remarks: 6. Interest to DSP readers (check one - see http://www.elsevier.com/locate/dsp): ___ of great interest to most readers ___ of great interest to a few readers ___ of interest to most readers ___ of little interest to any reader 7. Does the paper contribute (check all that apply): ___ new principles ___ new results ___ valuable review or tutorial treatment ___ other valuable contribution to the subject ___ improved understanding 8. Recommendations (check one): ___ the manuscript should be published in Digital Signal Processing (likely to bring credit to DSP) ___ the manuscript should be published after minor revisions indicated below ___ the manuscript requires major revisions before publication ___ the manuscript should be submitted to another journal, such as ______________________________ ___ the manuscript should not be published (likely to downgrade the status of DSP) Please note that your recommendation and reviewer report are expected to cover the Highlights and Graphical Abstract if submitted with the manuscript. 9. Confidential recommendations for the Editors (please use additional page if needed): --



※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 1.164.95.29
※ 文章网址: https://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/AfterPhD/M.1489339814.A.EE2.html







like.gif 您可能会有兴趣的文章
icon.png[问题/行为] 猫晚上进房间会不会有憋尿问题
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] 选了错误的女孩成为魔法少女 XDDDDDDDDDD
icon.png[正妹] 瑞典 一张
icon.png[心得] EMS高领长版毛衣.墨小楼MC1002
icon.png[分享] 丹龙隔热纸GE55+33+22
icon.png[问题] 清洗洗衣机
icon.png[寻物] 窗台下的空间
icon.png[闲聊] 双极の女神1 木魔爵
icon.png[售车] 新竹 1997 march 1297cc 白色 四门
icon.png[讨论] 能从照片感受到摄影者心情吗
icon.png[狂贺] 贺贺贺贺 贺!岛村卯月!总选举NO.1
icon.png[难过] 羡慕白皮肤的女生
icon.png阅读文章
icon.png[黑特]
icon.png[问题] SBK S1安装於安全帽位置
icon.png[分享] 旧woo100绝版开箱!!
icon.pngRe: [无言] 关於小包卫生纸
icon.png[开箱] E5-2683V3 RX480Strix 快睿C1 简单测试
icon.png[心得] 苍の海贼龙 地狱 执行者16PT
icon.png[售车] 1999年Virage iO 1.8EXi
icon.png[心得] 挑战33 LV10 狮子座pt solo
icon.png[闲聊] 手把手教你不被桶之新手主购教学
icon.png[分享] Civic Type R 量产版官方照无预警流出
icon.png[售车] Golf 4 2.0 银色 自排
icon.png[出售] Graco提篮汽座(有底座)2000元诚可议
icon.png[问题] 请问补牙材质掉了还能再补吗?(台中半年内
icon.png[问题] 44th 单曲 生写竟然都给重复的啊啊!
icon.png[心得] 华南红卡/icash 核卡
icon.png[问题] 拔牙矫正这样正常吗
icon.png[赠送] 老莫高业 初业 102年版
icon.png[情报] 三大行动支付 本季掀战火
icon.png[宝宝] 博客来Amos水蜡笔5/1特价五折
icon.pngRe: [心得] 新鲜人一些面试分享
icon.png[心得] 苍の海贼龙 地狱 麒麟25PT
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] (君の名は。雷慎入) 君名二创漫画翻译
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] OGN中场影片:失踪人口局 (英文字幕)
icon.png[问题] 台湾大哥大4G讯号差
icon.png[出售] [全国]全新千寻侘草LED灯, 水草

请输入看板名称,例如:e-shopping站内搜寻

TOP