※ 引述《chljk (油腻腻)》之铭言： : 抱歉,文法方面我帮不到你 : 但我觉得题目本身有问题 : 一般口语话根本不会这样说 : 若我我会说: : Mr. Brown spent a lot of money on a villa with two big rooms : and a garden. : 或是 : Mr. Brown spent a lot of money buying a villa, which has two big rooms : and a garden. : 有时过於注重文法,却忽略外国人本身是否真会这样用 : 有点模糊了我们学英文的重点 : ※ 引述《candydream (Better and better!)》之铭言： : : 昨天是凭记忆打出的句子,今天上班看了一下,上来更正,希望大家再提供见解@@ : : Mr. Brown spent a lot of money buying a villa _____ there are two : : big rooms and a garden. (A) it (B) he (C) that (D) X : : 答案给C ,题目卷详解给的理由是 that/which 皆可,因为关代做为S : : 有板友提出答案应为where,这也是昨天我和同事讨论出的结论之ㄧ, : : 认为应该是 which there are two big rooms and a garden in : : = in which there are two big rooms and a garden : : = where there are two big rooms and a garden : : 但我还想确认能不能解成 that + S + V + O 作为villa这个受词的补语呢? : : 谢谢 ^^ 其实我之前也有碰过同样的问题，所以我那时就去找了一下文法书 (English Grammar--A function-based introduction) Chap 9整章都是在谈关系子句，我大概把书里的一点重点打下来，希望能帮助到你。 9.3.3 The Relative Pronoun Strategy The first relativization strategy in English involves the use of case-marked relative pronouns.In most cases, these pronouns are derived historically from case-marked interrogative pronouns.Typical though somewhat idealized examples are: (44) a. subject : The man "who" stopped by the house... b. object : The man "whom" she married... c. Place : The village "where" she lived... d. Reason : (The reason)"why" she left... e. Time : (The time)"when" he arrived... f. manner : (The way) "how" she did it... In the case of subject and object(44a,b), the need to specify the case-role of the missing noun is real, given that typically "a man" can be either subject, object, or indirect object. In the case of examples(44c,d,e,f), the need for case-role assignment is to some extent superfluous. This is so because the head nouns themselves--"village/reason/time/way"--are semantically constraining. By their very meaning, they tend to suggest the case-role of the missing noun-- location, reason, time, manner, respectively. 9.3.4 The Relative Subordinator Strategy Another relativization strategy in English dispenses with case-marked relative-pronouns, and employs the neutral "subordinator"--that--at the beginning of the relative clause.This strategy cannot be used freely for all case-roles. It is employed most commonly with direct or some indirect object roles, and less commonly with subjects and adverbial roles. Some examples: Cf.44 (45) a. subject: The man "that"stopped... b. object : The man "that" she married... c. Place : *The village "that" she lived... d. Time : *The time "that" he arrived... e. Manner : ?(The way) "that" she did it... f. Reason : (The reason)"that" he left... g. Indirect object: The woman that he lived with... When this strategy is available, choosing the invariant "that" over a case-marked relative-pronoun is a matter of considerable variation along lines of dialect, style, age, register, and individual preference. What is more, the use of the invariant "that" contributes nothing to "recovering" the case-role of the missing referent. Unlike Relative-pronouns, "that" is morphologically neutral,and yields no clue about the case-role of the missing co-referent role. 希望你看完这些觉得有帮助。 很值得看的一本书唷!:) --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 111.249.181.140 ※ 编辑: Ryan310265 来自: 111.249.181.140 (01/27 10:24) ※ 编辑: Ryan310265 来自: 111.249.181.140 (01/27 10:25)