※ 引述《ohmylife (小弟「o」)》之铭言： : : 那为何这看起来显然不是历史问题的问题可以存活在历史板，而不是请转研究所板 : 历史哲学那块问题先不提，就您说的这点，请见本板板规 : 一、总则 : 1.本板为一讨论历史问题、提供历史知识分享、交流、 : 发表历史解释、见解，以及存放关於历史学习相关资源、 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ : 资讯、情报、方法的园地。 ^^^^ ＂历史解释，以及..历史学习相关..的方法＂属於本板允许的话题， ＂历史哲学＂似乎也相当程度地符合此要件。 我查了英文wiki，历史哲学事实上相当符合本板讨论的内容， 如果历史哲学的范畴真的违反板规，恐怕应该还要多删非常多文章。 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_philosophy Philosophy of history asks at least three basic questions: What is the proper unit for the study of the human past — the individual subject? The polis ("city") or sovereign territory? The civilization or culture? Or the whole of the human species? 研究人类过去事件的适当单位：个人，城市，主权疆域，文明，文化，全体人类？ Are there any broad patterns that we can discern through the study of the human past? Are there, for example, patterns of progress? Or cycles? Is history deterministic? Or are there no patterns or cycles, and is human history therefore random and devoid of any meaning? Related to this is the study of individual agency and its impact in history, functioning within, or opposed to, larger trends and patterns. 人类过去发展的广义模式？... If history can indeed be said to progress, what is its ultimate direction? Is it a positive or negative direction? And what (if any) is the driving force of that progress? 历史进步的最终方向？这方向是好是坏？推进力为何？ ----------------------------------------------------- Social evolutionism The validity of the "hero" in historical studies 社会演化 英雄的有效性.. ＂历史哲学＂看起来是个蛮丰富的领域，跟历史很相关， 我个人很期待看到这个板上有议题的讨论。 -- _^_ 6@_@9 4| |6 ///||\\ 地球人要小心啊 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.168.161.224 ※ 编辑: Geigemachen 来自: 118.168.161.224 (05/12 15:47) ※ 编辑: Geigemachen 来自: 118.168.161.224 (05/12 15:47) ※ 编辑: Geigemachen 来自: 118.168.161.224 (05/12 15:48) ※ 编辑: Geigemachen 来自: 118.168.161.224 (05/12 21:19)