- M6A2E1 armor will be brought to its historical parameters, when the vehicle is reworked to HD - currently, M6A2E1 uses not M6A2 hull, but M6 hull M6A2E1 的装甲会在HD化时一并改回史实数据 目前 WoT 里的 M6A2E1 模型是使用 M6 底盘，而非 M6E2 - WoT damage model doesn’t allow to model linear armor thickness change of armor, it would be too complicated to compute and would require too much computing power, that’s why armor is modelled as consisting of zones of individual thicknesses WoT 使用的伤害模组系统无法做出线性的装甲厚度变化，需要的计算太复杂；所以目前的 模型是一片片单一装甲值的区块拼起来的 - the same goes for modelling real 3D armor plates (currently, armor is modelled as a 2D plane with a virtual number, representing its thickness) 「装甲板立体建模」也有一样的问题（目前装甲是一个2D平面，附有代表厚度的数值） - regarding War Thunder, its ability to heavily modify various stickers on tanks, all the while War Thunder fans go “OMG REALISM”: (Bigangrycat) “That’s the usual War Thunder fans doublethink. This is by far not the only expression of the famous rule ‘what you call spies, we call recon!’ The system of applying decals on vehicles in War Thunder is very flexible, but on the other hand the result is that many vehicles in the game are painted either with the “LOOK AT ME DUDES IM A DESIGNER” in mind, or trollishly, like the famous ‘horse fucking a pin-up girl’ composition.” WT 的车体彩绘系统很自由？ Bigangrycat：「会有些问题，玩家的创意很神；而且很容易出现不雅的组合，像是『弯腰 女郎後面站一只用後脚站立的马』之类的」 （译者：我懒得逐字翻了，反正没啥内容。例图见推文四楼） - regarding whining about bad World of Tanks physics, compared to War Thunder (Bigangrycat) “I suggest checking with those, who play War Thunder: Ground Forces how it goes with ‘tree climbing’ ;) Or try it yourself, if you manage to get a beta key” 比起 WT，WoT 的物理系统很烂？ Bigangrycat：「他们的车会爬树」 （译者：我懒得逐字翻了。WT的物理系统仍需调校是真的…） http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/03/29/29-3-2014/ -- In church, they say to forgive! Forgiveness is between them and God; it's my job to arrange the meeting. 《 Man on Fire 》 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 111.253.124.129 ※ 文章网址: http://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/WoT/M.1396166016.A.680.html ※ 编辑: WillieHuang (111.253.124.129), 03/30/2014 19:04:59