"I feel like Moses. In the Sea of Red...." -XVM:32% = - P.Bityukov confirms the appearance of early model Panzer IV this year (SS: 9.0) Bityukov确认四号战车早期型会在今年出现(SS:9.0) - SerB states that it’s completely possible there is an error in the US M68 gun weight (it’s too heavy), if there is time, the developers will move the weight from the gun to the turret (SS: the way module weight works is that although some modules have their historical weight, the important part is the sum of all weights, so module weight itself is basically a balance parameter) SerB表示美国L7看来太重了，开发组有空的话会把炮的重量减低，但是这些被扣的重量 会加回炮塔上面。 (SS:某些模组总重是史实，但是大原则是整辆车的重量不便，所以当作平衡性修正就好) - next account migration from RU to US won’t come anytime soon 短期内不开放RU转US (RU会有人想转到NA?来虐菜的吗Orz) - no TD hardcap is planned, because artillery (that was hardcapped) has very specific gameplay and TD’s don’t TD不会有每场数量限制，因为SPG(有限制)的玩法很特别，TD不会。 - SerB confirms that there will be transitions between various branches of the EU tree (SS: for example, the Czechoslovak T-21 into Hungarian Turán branch) SerB确认在EU科技树里会有很多「转线」。 (SS:例如说捷克斯洛伐克的T-21转匈牙利Turan) - in the EU tree, tanks in different configurations will not change their nationality, because it would be a mess (SS: specifically, Czechoslovak TNH tanks in various configurations could belong to Sweden, Switzerland, Czechoslovakia, Latvia etc. – the player was asking, whether by changing its configuration (turret, gun), the tank will switch nationality – yes, it’s a dumb question) EU线战车的装备设定不影响国籍，这样做只会造成大混乱。 (SS:例如说CZ-SK的THN有瑞典、瑞士、本国、拉脱维亚之类的版本，玩家在问的问题是 换个炮或换个炮塔会不会改变车的国籍，笨问题。) - M103 was picked for HD re-work in 9.0, because it was the only American heavy tank, that was in active service M103在9.0HD名单上的原因是它是唯一有服役的美国重坦。 - Tortoise was picked because it’s well known and high-tier, T-34/85 and IS tanks were picked because they are symbols of Soviet WW2 victory 土龟因为很有名+高阶，T-34/85和IS是因为是苏联二战胜利象徵物。 - the Maus turret flying off in today’s trailer might not be the final version, but Storm states that they have seen a reference video from Syria, where a turret flies for ten seconds (!) after ammo rack explosion 鼠式炮塔炸飞可能还不是最终版。 Storm顺带提到在叙利亚内战时有辆战车的弹药架爆炸10秒之後炮塔才飞掉。 - Storm states that “normal multithreading” (SS: multicore support I think) will not give the game the performance boost everyone expects, it’s not the universal solution to all problems Storm表示多线程并不会让程式表现优化太多，这招不是万灵丹。 - Storm adds to the issue above that there is no universal optimization solution that would solve everything, instead, Wargaming has to improve things a bit on 10 different places and the result will come. These places are for example CPU multithread, GPU multithread, reworked grass, trees and bushes render, new optimized anti-aliasing, new optimized water render, landscape render optimization, more active model level of detail, new effects render. There is a lot of work now. - the points above are being worked on Storm追加，优化没有万灵丹，WG做的是在十个不同的地方做出小更动，例如说CPU/GPU 的多线程、重制植物滤镜、反锯齿等等等等。 = WOWS=World of Wait, Shxt. 总之又是Alpha Tester炫耀文... You know, there’s something vivid about the word “Cruiser”. It’s one of those words that conjures up the image of what it means: large and powerful, but unexpectedly agile and speedy for such a large ship. Perhaps you can see why I compared them to wolves. These ships are fairly capable of “solo performance” and acting independently from the rest of the fleet, while also being effective in supporting their fellows in “the pack”. Perhaps it is their versatility that makes it hard for players to clearly grasp how to best play these ships. The role is quite clear for battleships – they are mighty and huge, while destroyers are sneaky and light. How then should we assess cruisers? 「巡洋舰」会让人想起一些鲜明印象，这个字混合了下列的特徵：巨大、强力但出乎意 料的灵活敏捷。或许这样你可以理解为何我将她们比做狼群。这些舰艇可以单打独斗， 脱离主舰队作战，也适合以狼群支援她们的夥伴。或许是她们多样化的特色让玩家很难 捉摸如何玩这些船。战舰的定位很明确──庞大、威武，而驱逐舰则机巧灵活。那我们 该怎麽定位巡洋舰？ Playing as a Medium was not the way… 反正不要像MT那样开就是了。 When I was initially invited to the World of Warships Alpha Test, cruisers were the first ships that I set my eyes on. Back then, I was attracted by the low reloading time and thus the high rate of fire. Nine high-calibre barrels each firing a salvo every 10 seconds – this was surely no place for jokes! Their manoeuvrability was also impressive. Unfortunately my World of Tanks experience was of no use. Fighting with your cruiser the same way you would with medium tanks is a really bad idea. Just imagine that the IS-7 that you’ re about to corner fires not one, but six shells at you when you approach it. This is what actually happened to me in those early battles. 刚被邀请参加Alpha时，巡洋舰是我最早注目的舰种。当时，我被低装填时间─也就是高 射速吸引。九门重炮，十秒一轮齐射──帅耶。机动性也让我印象深刻。 然而我的WOT经验派不上用场。把CA当MT开是个烂主意。想一下这个情境，当你打算绕 一台IS-7而冲上前去时，受到的还击不是一发，是六发。 这基本上就是我一开始玩的时候遇上的事。 My strongest memory of those failures is when I was destroyed by a single (supposedly blind) salvo from a distance of over 30km. Damn, I thought, this really must be a completely useless vessel. However, in the following battle it was me on my cruiser that whirled around an enemy battleship in the immunity zone, peppering it with my salvos and distracting it from my fellow carriers. So where is the power, folks? 我最惨烈的经验是我被一轮(大概是盲射)30公里以外来的齐射直接砸下海底。 「干」，我当时想「这艘废船...」，可是在接下来的几场，又是我本人开着巡洋舰 在免疫区绕着对方的战舰开，用齐射把对方砸得四处是洞，外加把他的注意从同队的航母 身上引开。 所以，强势点到底在哪？ The cruiser’s real power is its versatility. Want to repel enemy aviation? Engage a destroyer? Meet an enemy battleship with an HE salvo? None of these are a problem for a cruiser! High manoeuvrability and acceleration allow these ships to effectively dodge battleship attacks, while striking back at them with HE shells and easily clearing the decks of everything that isn’t welded down properly. Japanese cruisers are also capable of carrying torpedo launchers, making it possible for them to block strategic approaches. In proper hands, cruisers are very powerful tools indeed. 巡洋舰的真正优势在於全方位。想驱赶对方飞机？扁驱逐舰？用HE弹洗对方战舰？都不是 问题！良好的操纵性与加速能力让她们可以有效回避战舰舰炮，同时用HE弹回敬，把对方 甲板上所有没焊紧的东西全部砸飞。日本巡洋舰还可以发动鱼雷攻击，让对方无法逼近。 只要正确操纵，巡洋舰是很强大的舰种。 One for all 我为人人.... A cruiser’s survival in 1-on-1 battles largely depends on the overall course of the battle. For example, a direct head-on advance towards a battleship will obviously be suicidal, especially if you’re far away from the rest of your team. Despite a number of decent cannons, that rapid reload time is still not fast enough to beat a battleship one-on-one. On the other hand, engaging an advancing destroyer is likely to be far more successful. The short reloading time allows cruisers to lock precisely on to a target within just a minute or so, ensuring the enemy ship will be met with a sufficient amount of shells. 巡洋舰在单挑中生存的机率主要取决於战斗的进行。例如说对着战舰打冲锋基本上是在送 头，特别是你远离主力舰队的状况下特别明显。即使安装了许多高射速的强力火炮，仍然 不足以单吃一艘战舰。另一方面，接战一艘接近中的驱逐舰会成功许多，高射速可以让 巡洋舰在一分钟左右就完成弹着修正，让足够的炮弹砸在敌舰上面。 Packs of cruisers are even more menacing. Their anti-aircraft effectiveness grows immensely in groups, and dense cannon fire can present a threat to any opponent. A single pair of Japanese “Takao” class cruisers can perform intense torpedo attacks just as well as destroyers. In addition, survivability within a group is much higher than when solo. 巡洋舰战队是更猛的打法。战队的防空火力效果会急遽上升，舰炮的弹雨也会威胁所有舰 种。两艘高雄级可以像驱逐舰战队一样发动猛烈的鱼雷攻击。此外一起走的生存机会也比 自干高得多。 Cruiser gameplay differs from ship to ship, depending on their construction and nationality. For instance, US ships are quite effective against enemy planes, whereas Japanese vessels possess somewhat weak artillery. However, those torpedo launchers compensate, allowing them to advance for aggressive attacks. 巡洋舰的玩法每艘不同，和建成状态、国籍都有关。例如说美国舰艇的防空能力就非常 优秀，但是日本防空就相对弱势。然而这个弱点有鱼雷补回来，日本船因此可以打的 非常具有侵略性。 (译注：从Pensacola之後USCA就不装鱼雷) Captain, we have a ship full of noobs! 舰长，我们全船都菜逼八啊！ That versatility needs to be paid for. Essentially this means that you have to spend more time to master a cruiser. You need to spend your spare time tracking recon planes, aiming and shooting at destroyers while simultaneously dodging their return attacks – this is pretty complex activity for a newcomer. You’ll really need to be good at doing several things at once before you get your hands on a cruiser. 这种全方位是有代价的。基本上，想开好CA要花更多时间上手。你得用空闲时间追踪 侦察机、瞄准驱逐舰开火外加回避对方的还击─对新手来说颇复杂。开巡洋舰之前 最好确认你擅长同时做好几件事情。 Take your time to master it and you’ll gradually become an advanced sailor. While they may be dynamic vessels, cruisers actually demand thoughtful and careful operation. These ships are precise tools to be used, sparingly and with exact timing. 慢慢练习，你会慢慢变成老练的水手。即使巡洋舰是高机动性的舰艇，操舰时仍然 要慎重且经过思考。她们是必须慎重、精确操纵的战斗机器。 -- Wild Player: "MM keeps kicking me in my fricking balls" My friend : "SerB:' Don't grow balls.' " --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.115.99.63 我看错了XDDD 美国WW2： BB:州名 CA/CL:城市 DD:任何有贡献的死人(大概是这样) CV:独立战争/美国史的重要事件(不完全是，像是大E就是袭名，另外从Essex就不管这 规则了) 英国会照同级首舰命名(例如海军上将级>胡德/纳尔逊/罗德尼/豪威) ，不过我得说英国佬很喜欢很艰深的字... 德国驱逐舰一概称Z-某某，CL是地名，CA/BB是军事史上名人为主。 ※ 编辑: hsinhanchu 来自: 220.129.32.55 (03/02 23:16)