昨天才在想说SerB大概是偷懒 今天又勤劳了起来... - SerB states that WoT won't be transferred to a new game engine, it would increase the costs and reduce the speed of development SerB表示WOT不会转到新的游戏引擎上（BigWorld?），这会让我们的研发 成本变高并降低开发的速度。 - there has been a project to put a gun more powerful than the BL-9 on IS-3: the D-83 有一个威力更强的火炮D-83已经被计画放到IS-3上。 - a high power 122mm gun was tested on an IS-2 (more powerful than the D-25) 一个火力更强的122毫米口径火炮曾在IS-2上（比D-25更棒） - there were plans to equip the Tigers with engines more powerful than the 700hp one, for example an 870hp Maybach, there were even more advanced engines, but not for Tiger – by the time they were developed, Tiger was already replaced by Tiger II (and in future by E-75) 曾经有计画把一个870匹马力的梅巴赫引擎装在虎式上，取代700匹的那颗 ，另外还有一些不是给虎式的进阶引擎，不过在他们研发完成时虎式已经 被虎王以及在更未来的E-75计画所取代。 - a non-penetrating HE explosion (on armor) can also set an engine on fire (modules get damaged even if the shell doesn't penetrate) 没有击穿装甲的HE一样能够帮引擎「上火」（就算炮弹没穿，零件还是会 受到伤害） - repair kit doesn't fix only the equipment function, but also its hitpoints 维修包不只能修理零件的功能，血量也能回复（译：应该可以完全回复） - for now the devs haven’t had time to discuss the perk/skill rebalance issues 开发组现在没空检讨历练／技能的重新平衡问题。 - there is no additional bonus for critting enemy gun barrel than for damaging other modules 目前击伤敌车的炮管不会比击伤其他零件获得更多额外的奖励。 - Q: "How high will be the maximum speed of the new tier 10 French heavy without autoloader?" A: "As high as I implement it" Q：「无弹荚炮法国新十阶重坦可以跑夺快？」 A：「我们设定夺快就能夺快。」 - Q: "I'd like to see Soviet tanks with autoloaders, why aren't there any?" A: "Because the Soviets didn't bother with autoloaders" Q：「为啥苏联一台弹荚车都没有？我想要啊！」 A：「因为苏联没将心思放在这货上。」 - the fact that a skill training is non-linear (first few percent require least XP and the last percent requires most XP to train) was made with the intent of skill starting to work faster and the average skill level related to period of time being higher 组员技能训练的的经验累计并非线性增长（一开始要很少，最後面要最多 ），这是为了让技能能够作用的更早，并让一个特定时间内的平均技能等 级更高。 （译：这段我大概懂他意思，但是很难翻成通顺且易懂的语言QAQ） - SerB states that oscillating turrets and autoloaders are so good in the game, because reliability does not play a role in WoT. This is intentional, as the developers do not want the player to "fight their own tank”, lower real life reliability of components is sometimes implemented as lower amount of module hitpoints for example SerB表示游戏中的摇摆式炮塔以及其中的自动装填系统很棒的原因，是因 为可靠性因素（译：例如在实战中的运作，晃动、脏污、故障率等等所带 　来的可能问题）并没有影响。这是故意的，因为开发者不想让玩家有「跟 　自己的战车杠上」（译：这句不太确定）的感觉。例如可靠性较低的零组 　件有时候会开发成拥有较低的生命值。 - the fact you disable the encounter and assault modes has no influence on map selection 关掉「遭遇战」与「突击战」模式不会对你的地图选择造成影响。 - Soviet autocannon Sh-37 penetration values were taken from tests conducted under 60 degrees and not 90 degrees (they are not historical), because with the 90 degrees pen the gun would be way too overpowered 苏联Sh-37自动机炮（装在苏联IL-2跟Yak-7上的玩意儿）的穿深数据取自 小於60度角的测试数据，而非90度角（并没有按照史实），因为90度角的 数据会让这玩意儿变得太OP。 - based on previous questions, a player asks where else is the penetration lower than historical, SerB replies that it's like that with many premium shells for example 之前有个玩家问说还有哪个炮的穿深低於史实，这个问题SerB回覆说：例 如很多金弹都是这麽设定的。 - SerB states that while the hull drawings for IS-3 on the internet are fully adequate, the drawings of the turret armor are quite complicated and that's why they haven't been laid out SerB说尽管网路上有关IS-3的车体草图已经足够齐全了，但炮塔的草图却 十分复杂，这就是为什麽我们没办法确定最後设定的原因。 - 122mm U-11 was not proposed for KV-2, it's in the game as a stock gun for balance reasons U-11（KV-1的122炮）没有装在KV-2上的提案，游戏中完全是为了平衡的 理由而作为白板炮放在KV-2上。 - SerB states that even though there is a new trend on RU server (players intentionally playing bad to have worst stats possible) , the thing that will be punished will be these players' individual transgressions, not the trend as a whole SerB表示最近俄服好像有新风气（玩家故意打烂让数据变差），尽管如此 　这样的事情只会造成个别玩家的违规受到惩罚，风气本身没问题。 - at this moment, it is not planned for shells to cause weak armor zones (SS: as in, a shell damages armor and the spot will be easier to penetrate), apparently this was planed until closed testing, it's possible it might appear in the future, but SerB states the problem with this would be player perception ("how the hell did they penetrate that spot with a weak gun”) 目前没有炮弹击中使战车装甲产生弱点的计画（SS：炮弹击中造成装甲弱 化，变得更好击穿），不过这机制从封测开始就在测试了，之後有可能会 放进游戏里。但SerB表示这个问题是玩家的个人想法（威力烂的炮怎麽穿 的了那种地方？） （译：对SerB的Troll感到不解中...） - there will be no "special" tank destroyer vehicle usable only in 7/42 不会有只能在7/42模式里头使用的特殊TD。（译：不懂问问题的目的） - it's possible the Panther II from Patton museum (SS: Panther II hull with Panther Ausf.G turret) will make it to the game, perhaps as an optional hull 巴顿博物馆里的黑豹二可能会以「可选车体」的方式会做进游戏里头。 （SS：黑豹二的车身配上豹式G型炮塔） - SerB and Storm confirm that T-44-85 will NOT be in 8.9, it's too weak and requires more testing, apparently the penetration will be buffed SerB确认T-44-85不会在8.9更新释出，这辆车太弱了，需要更多的测试。 至少他的穿身会被BUFF。 - apparently the function where you can add your own notices to your friend list contacts has been considered, but it's impossible for some reason to transfer it server-side 考虑增加「可以添加提示讯息在好友旁」的功能，但是因为某些理由，没 办法随着伺服器端转移。（译：有点不确定） 这篇打完要来面对我的英国近代史作业了，大家随意看吧（倒地 如果有翻译上的问题可以留言告知 我明天如果活着回来再来改... -- --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 1.169.147.210 应该可以这麽说...口语化的表现 orz 所以之後要翻的话，还是翻自动装填比较好吗? ※ 编辑: tai33ru 来自: 1.169.147.210 (10/22 21:49)