作者Cimon (Simon)
看板Warfare
标题[转录][推荐] 军事史之史观理论003
时间Fri Jan 14 19:50:25 2005
※ [本文转录自 historia 看板]
作者: MRZ (LQY) 看板: historia
标题: [推荐] 军事史之史观理论003
时间: Fri Jan 14 18:31:59 2005
There is considerable consensus among military/war historians about the
meaning of the terms of relevance here. Still, the consensus could certainly
be broader, and even within it we can easily observe deficiencies as regards
consistency and clarity in the use of the terms. One consequence of this—
and not necessarily an unfortunate one—is that this article cannot confine
itself simply to describing a—somewhat confused—state of affairs but must,
with light touches, try to put the relevant terminology into somewhat better
‘order’. It should, however, be noted that this attempt does not aim at
any kind of theoretical innovation but merely at giving the reader a clearer
and more systematic picture of the various major sub-fields of work of the
practising military/war historians (most of whom would certainly recognise
and accept this picture, immediately or on consideration).
军事与战争史学家对於军事或战争史的意义﹐仍存有辩论。因为军事或战争史所包
含的范围广阔﹐所以此一科目的研究与传承本身也缺乏一致与清晰的分界线。很不
幸的是﹐本文无法对军事或战争史的涵盖范围做一个简单扼要的定义﹐所以只好在
尽可能不偏离主题的情况下﹐将本文所要讨论的事情给浓缩在一个有限的范围内﹐
并建立起一个基本的理论基础。请各位读者注意的是﹐本文并不是在阐述什麽创新
的观点﹐而是将以往的各家说法之中﹐进行精挑细选的整理之後﹐在陈列在各位的
--
LQY附注﹕简单来说﹐这一段是客套话﹐这种客套话常常出现在欧美的学术报告或论
文里面﹐目的是避免顾此失彼。欧美学者在做学问的态度上面﹐都颇有儒风﹔与我
国某些‘大师’和他们徒子徒孙的态度相比﹐我将来若是有小孩要选修文科﹐就算
是选修中文系﹐我大概都考虑把他们送到欧美留学。
面前。(其中所讨论到的军事或战争史学家﹐都是军事史学界公认的大师级人物。)
--
万物皆非主,唯曼尼大神,至圣之先知,亚当史密斯。
La ilaha ill money,Adam Smith rasula'Llah
荣耀归於曼尼。自宇宙之初成﹐贯古今与未来﹐直至永恒不灭。喀锵!(收银机响声)
Gloria patri Money. Sicut erat in principio,
et nunc, et semper, et in saecula saeculorum.Ka-ching!
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.30.77.184
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.250.145