作者A1Yoshi (我是妖西)
看板W-Philosophy
标题Re: [请益] 关於海德格
时间Thu Dec 20 15:56:14 2007
看推文吵起来还挺有趣的。我朋友给了我一个连结，我略读一下发现
和我最近这几篇文讲的地方交集很多。不过我之前没看过这一篇，连
结如下，给大家参考之：
http://www.philosophicalgourmet.com/analytic.asp
其中我引一段，做为回应我的「主流说」的补充：
Although it appears to be a widespread view in the humanities that
"analytic" philosophy is "dead" or "dying," the
professional
situation of analytic philosophy simply does not bear this out.
All
the Ivy League universities,
all the leading state research universities,
all the University of California campuses,
most of the top liberal
arts colleges,
most of the flagship campuses of the second-tier state
research universities boast philosophy departments that overwhelmingly
self-identify as "analytic": it is hard to imagine a "movement" that
is more academically and professionally entrenched than analytic
philosophy.
顺道一提，这段短短文字其实也（部分）呈现了我所谓的简单直接清
楚：瞧他都用多简单的英文字啊！大概除了"entrench"可能算是超过
台湾高中水准的单字以外，要看这一段根本不需要查字典！：D
还有一件事。其实我前面讲的大师德西达....我看了几篇文好像压根
没人把他分在欧陆哲学家。。。这件事也很有趣。
他绝对不是分析哲学家。而他又不属於欧陆 -> 所以他根本不是哲学
家，哈哈哈～～
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 82.11.187.202
※ 编辑: A1Yoshi 来自: 82.11.187.202 (12/20 16:06)
1F：→ RitsuN:感谢配合 m(_ _)m 12/20 16:08
※ 编辑: A1Yoshi 来自: 82.11.187.202 (12/20 16:10)
2F：推 RAYBO:其实本来就不该将德希达视为欧陆哲学的样板人物呀...他本身 12/20 18:32
3F：→ RAYBO:在欧陆也是争议性的~~印象中他好像还是在美国红回欧洲的~ 12/20 18:33