W-Philosophy 板


LINE

※ 引述《realove (realove)》之铭言: : 你问这个问题还蛮有趣滴 : 我不知道I会怎麽回答 但ㄟ : 我说一下我个人的意见 : 我想I之前 就有强调两种意义的possible world : 一种是david lewis讲的possible world : (我对lewis没有很熟 讲错了请纠正) : 这种possible world的集合 包括了actual world Yes, and Lewis said all possible worlds (all members in W) are concrete. : 另一种是kripke讲的possible world : 这种意义下的possible world是相对於actual world而言 它实际上不存在 却有可能存在 : 如假如有一个世界的状态是 Aristotle不是柏拉图的学生 那这只是一个可以被想像的 : (conceivalbe)possible world 而不是actual world : 所以对kripke而言 possible world的集合里并不包括actual world No, Kripke semantics says nothing about actual world. and there is no outstanding reason suppose actual world is different from other possible worlds semantically, since we can handle all relevant issues in modal logic. Simplification is one of our concerns. I will show you, if actual world is different from other possible worlds, then its model will look like what. Suppose I can do that. Model-theoratically, If Kripke supposed actual world is not in W, there will be a serious problem in the original model. The problem is that we get some objects the model cant handle. The original Kripke's model have to be modified. Intutively, we can say that actual world (wa) itself is a set , and has its own relations, so that our new model for wa becomes <Wa,Ra,v> , called Mwa. But soon we encounter a crux, since wa is different from its friends - others possible world. Between them, there must have at least a relation(?) between them, or we cant draw a clear line to specify them. Models for other possible worlds would be <Wo,Ro,v>, called Mom. The most important target now is try to find the diagram between Mom & Mwa, so that we can get a "good" semantics for this topic. Forgive my ignorance and foolish, the easiest way is to say this diagram is isomorphic. For a reson(not quiet strickly), its very unwisdom to divde similar realtions into Ro and Ra. Now we have a new model functions as K, very likely in practice. So, we use the orignal K-semantics again. Something tricky, isnt it? --



※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.143.99
1F:→ aletheia:抱歉刚没注意 有个地方不对 修改一下 10/19 16:54
※ 编辑: aletheia 来自: 140.112.143.99 (10/19 16:58)
2F:推 realove:你说滴没错 我泼完就觉得kripke应该会把actual world看成 10/19 16:57
3F:→ realove:就是了.. 10/19 16:59







like.gif 您可能会有兴趣的文章
icon.png[问题/行为] 猫晚上进房间会不会有憋尿问题
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] 选了错误的女孩成为魔法少女 XDDDDDDDDDD
icon.png[正妹] 瑞典 一张
icon.png[心得] EMS高领长版毛衣.墨小楼MC1002
icon.png[分享] 丹龙隔热纸GE55+33+22
icon.png[问题] 清洗洗衣机
icon.png[寻物] 窗台下的空间
icon.png[闲聊] 双极の女神1 木魔爵
icon.png[售车] 新竹 1997 march 1297cc 白色 四门
icon.png[讨论] 能从照片感受到摄影者心情吗
icon.png[狂贺] 贺贺贺贺 贺!岛村卯月!总选举NO.1
icon.png[难过] 羡慕白皮肤的女生
icon.png阅读文章
icon.png[黑特]
icon.png[问题] SBK S1安装於安全帽位置
icon.png[分享] 旧woo100绝版开箱!!
icon.pngRe: [无言] 关於小包卫生纸
icon.png[开箱] E5-2683V3 RX480Strix 快睿C1 简单测试
icon.png[心得] 苍の海贼龙 地狱 执行者16PT
icon.png[售车] 1999年Virage iO 1.8EXi
icon.png[心得] 挑战33 LV10 狮子座pt solo
icon.png[闲聊] 手把手教你不被桶之新手主购教学
icon.png[分享] Civic Type R 量产版官方照无预警流出
icon.png[售车] Golf 4 2.0 银色 自排
icon.png[出售] Graco提篮汽座(有底座)2000元诚可议
icon.png[问题] 请问补牙材质掉了还能再补吗?(台中半年内
icon.png[问题] 44th 单曲 生写竟然都给重复的啊啊!
icon.png[心得] 华南红卡/icash 核卡
icon.png[问题] 拔牙矫正这样正常吗
icon.png[赠送] 老莫高业 初业 102年版
icon.png[情报] 三大行动支付 本季掀战火
icon.png[宝宝] 博客来Amos水蜡笔5/1特价五折
icon.pngRe: [心得] 新鲜人一些面试分享
icon.png[心得] 苍の海贼龙 地狱 麒麟25PT
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] (君の名は。雷慎入) 君名二创漫画翻译
icon.pngRe: [闲聊] OGN中场影片:失踪人口局 (英文字幕)
icon.png[问题] 台湾大哥大4G讯号差
icon.png[出售] [全国]全新千寻侘草LED灯, 水草

请输入看板名称,例如:WOW站内搜寻

TOP