http://tinyurl.com/25hafe8 先感谢版上高手^^ 上一篇经过解释後才发现自己误会意思了 所以又找了一篇 原文第三段，有问题主要是最後一句。 附上全部的翻译 To examine what we really think about creativity, scientists asked students to present ideas for how airlines can get more revenue from their passengers. [为了了解我们到底怎样看待创造这件事，科学家请学生针对航 空公司要如何从乘客中获取更多利益提出相关解法] (针对航空公司要如何获取更多利益) (这句只写这样好像也不会影响意思?) Half the students were told to come up with novel solutions, and the rest were asked to stick with something more tried-and-true. [科学家要求一半的学生提出有新意的方法，剩下的 学生则是要他们找出已经被证实有用的方法] Other students who then listened to these pitches rated those who were innovative as having less leadership potential. (老实说 我搞不懂这句 ) 是A组的人说B组的人没有领导潜力? 还是另外有一组C组人 来评A组跟B组 然後推论B组的人没有领导潜力 硬翻的结果就变成 [结论是那些提出创新解法的人，被认定比较没有领导潜力] --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.160.145.77