作者RChandler (Chandler)
看板Publish
标题Re: [讨论] 关於编辑的「权力」
时间Mon Aug 14 23:37:10 2006
※ 引述《TonyDog (vivre simplement)》之铭言：
: 标题: [讨论] 关於编辑的「权力」
: 时间: Mon Aug 14 21:18:32 2006
:
According to your posts, there are academic journals.
In my fields(economics), there are two kinds of "editors".
One is the people whose names listed on the "editor board".
And they have "ABSOLUTE" power--they can want whatever they like,
including the veto right. The refree only can "suggest" the editors
to accept your paper, editors are the KING/QUEEN of the journal.
The other is the one who do all the format work, usually
we call them editorial assistant. From the title you can see
they have "NO" power.
In many cases(jpe, aer...many many good journals), they are
secetaries. The editorial assistant sometimes is a part-time job.
So, may I ask, which one were you arguing about?
: 在另一个版上，跟一位版友对於编辑的「权力」看法不同，
:
: 在徵得他的同意後，将文章转贴过来。
:
: 有意思的是：「编辑」的「权力」可以到哪里？
:
: 大家各自的出版社里有怎样的状况呢？
:
: 不知道大家对於这样的个案有怎样的看法？
:
:
: 底下是文章内容：
:
:
:
: --
:
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
: ◆ From: 82.234.73.133
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 70.80.45.76
1F：→ TonyDog:The former. :) 08/15 01:36
2F：推 imagewind:Funny .... 08/16 20:24