作者anavist (double A)
看板Physics
标题Re: [请益] 平行或垂直方向的偏振光才能通过偏光片?
时间Wed Jun 1 16:56:25 2011
我找了多资料
一个偏振光,能通过与它偏振方向一样的偏振片
还是通过与它偏振方向垂直的偏振片
两种说法都有文献资料
===================================================================
第一种说法是:偏光镜能吸收和它狭缝方向相同的偏振光
也就是偏振光偏振方向
要和偏光镜狭缝方向垂直(交於90度)才能通过
有维基百科的内容说明:
"For waves with electric fields perpendicular to
the wires, the electrons cannot move very far
across the width of each wire; therefore, little
energy is lost or reflected, and the incident wave
is able to travel through the grid. Since electric
field components parallel to the wires are absorbed
or reflected, the transmitted wave has an electric
field purely in the direction perpendicular to the
wires, and is thus linearly polarized. Note that the
polarization direction is perpendicular to the wires;
the notion that waves "slip through" the gaps between
the wires is incorrect."
(这段文字右边的图解和我们一般的理解不同)
(来源:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarizer )
引注文献: Nanotechnology, 2005, 16(9), 1874–1877
=====================================================================
第二种说法就是,偏光镜能让和它狭缝方向相同的偏振光通过
也就是偏振光偏振方向
要和偏光镜狭缝方向平行(交於0度)才能通过
很多课本和科普书籍都这麽解释
(例如《观念物理IV》第72页的图解)
所以我现在有点不太清楚哪种说法才是正确的
一种是我们平常的理解,另一种是文献资料和维基百科的背书
还有劳各位高手解答了
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.113.77.205
1F:推 funnypeter:wire grid偏振片 跟一般的偏振片是不一样的啊 06/01 17:18
2F:→ funnypeter:这两种说法没有冲突 因为第二种说法并不是指wire grid 06/01 17:19
3F:推 funnypeter:或者说 第一种你应该将穿透轴(transmission axis) 06/01 17:45
4F:→ funnypeter:认为是与wire方向垂直的方向 如此一来便符合Malus's la 06/01 17:46