投稿期刊: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 投稿日志: 3/20 initial, 3/27 with editor & given manuscript number, 4/29 decision: revise 文章工作经过: 此文章前後修改了半年, 在格式上, data数量上和自我一致性老师皆比较 要求, 希望能一次被审过. 个人则觉得自己在introduction写得比较生动. Reviewer #1: The work is well ordered and written. I consider that manuscript could be published after some minor revisions. (他叫我改图片配色) Reviewer #2: In principle, this Reviewer does not have objections to the publication of this manuscript in its current form. It is relatively well written and full of data. Editor: I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript received positive feedback from the reviewers. …I ask that the authors have a qualified English language reviewer carefully proofread and correct the manuscript for grammatical and stylistic errors. 心得: 这篇文章可能因为字数很多(约10000字), 因为怕看的人头昏, 所以修得比较小心. 这次的经验令我觉得文章的表面(英文, 陈述顺序, 有无type error)很重要, 让人找不到 你的毛病, 看得很顺的话, reviewer好像自然就不会质疑你scientific上的问题. 还有 Introduction是否能引人入胜也是相当重要的事. 昨天打开信箱有点惊到, 因为此期刊的 审稿周期平均半年, 一开始还在想是不是八成GG了, ORz… --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.43.4.6 ※ 编辑: cssula 来自: 114.43.4.6 (05/01 08:00)