※ 引述《LORDJACK (文亚南)》之铭言： : 我想很多网友对研究生协会有不适当的期待 : 研协本来就是个压力团体, 简单来说, 是个政治团体 : 就像一个工会, 你会期待哪个工会嫌自己薪水太高的吗? : 当然比起网友们的讨论, 这篇文宣品的讨论深度自然是不足的 : 有些网友更拿什麽研究方法之类的好笑观点来看这篇文宣 : 希望网友们也能依此要领去要求频果日报那些硕士级的记者 : 这是一篇成功的政治宣言 : 至少引起了媒体关注 Is it successful? Com'on. Taiwanese media look at everything like the others do; they even come to BBS to look for hunts. There are thousands of events can attract them. Then? If you guys can not provoke any more people, your statement will soon be forgot in dustbin somewhere. Most of the people will not bother, like me, to reply/answer you again and again. How can you provoke most of the people and get echoes? You need to stand on very good points, at least. Unfortunately, I tried to find but cannot see any such good points in your statement. : 相较於研协, 网上的网友成天在讨论研究生的地位, 台湾的学术发展 : 教育经费应该如何分配云云 : 讲难听一点, 在BBS上嘴炮了那麽多年对台湾的学术环境造成了什麽影响? Yes, this is also my question. However, can you answer this properly? including a proper survey, numerical data, or whatever. Before you can prove anything, don't imply them to be the others. : 台湾教育环境何时向各位大师希望的方向移动过了 : 阶级本身不团结, 发言团体垮掉了, 阶级永远弱势 Here we do communicate for science and improving the world; however we don't do communism usually. Get a proper and fair policy and come here, we will stand by you. : 有权力的教授老师们永远掌握各级会议, 利用各种有意无意的机会欺压你 : 说欺压太难听, 那就是吃豆腐好了 : 至於说什麽教授没有能力强迫学生做什麽那更是好笑了 : 就像说警察没有能力强迫你不闯红灯一样 : 你可以很自由的闯红灯, 然後警察开你罚单 : 除非警察无法对你做任何处置, 那才叫"不能强迫" Is this the only example you can provide? Go home and get another one. : 研协搭了一个舞台, 若是真心希望研究生的地位, 或是各种学术环境能提升的话 : 那应该加入这个舞台发表意见, 甚至请研协为你的意见背书 : 而不是这样冷言冷语, 回到清谈空论的时代 : 我怎麽看都看不出清谈是一个知识份子负责麽行为 neither does promotion of any irresponsible policy. --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 82.22.90.37