作者hyperion (雪橇犬退散！)
看板LegalTheory
标题Re: [问题] Rawl's "justice as fairness"
时间Wed Sep 13 10:00:53 2006
你读错了
"ethically unjustifiable" 是指「伦理（学）上不可接受的」
※ 引述《sarahgirl (  N )》之铭言：
: 刚好念到一句话
: 但是我怎麽想都想不通
: 我是念护理的,此句话出现在护理伦理的书目中
: "using income inequalities and ability to pat as screening devices for access
: to health care is ethically unjustifiable under this view of justise"
: 所以在Rawls的理论之下,用social economics status 来筛选一个人可使用的医疗资源
: -->是伦理上可以, 但是是不合理的...
: 我的问题是 怎样才算是合理?
--
Yours truly,
Chiaheng Seetoo
Member, Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2006-07
Juris Doctor, Class of 2007
College of Law, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 130.126.147.111