请注意提干所说: The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that --> 这 argument 容易遭受批评，因为其论点相信何者可能发生? 意思是，这并不完全是一个 weaken 题 而是应该要找 argument 当中 "自然" 或 "自我矛盾" 的错误 题目说高脚椅有两个优点 1. 顾客喜欢坐高脚椅看名人 2. 做高脚椅的，通常不会坐太久 (周转率高对商家有利) 但这两个论点很明显有矛盾的情形，想看名人应该不会想要提早走。 这就是答案 (C) 所表述。 Ron 解释在此: https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/post5683.html The key word is CRITICISM: you're looking for something that's WRONG with the argument. The OA, which is C, is just that: the 'generalization about lingering' is the idea that people won't sit at tall tables for as long as at short tables. Yet, according to the passage, the customers at tall tables will probably be there to gawk at celebrities, so they will probably stay for a long time - the 'exception' mentioned in this answer choice. 至於答案 (D) 我认为 Dustin 提供了一个不错的 idea profit 的确是要考虑到成本，在 Ron 论点里面也的确有提到 在这个人补充认为不可选的原因有 2 1. 如果时间待的短，金额付的少，但这并不能说"比例上"有变少 for example: 如果时间少一半，但付的金额确有 8 成， 那总体 profit 还是会上升 2. 这并不是 argument 本身自相矛盾的问题，不是一个好答案 ※ 引述《si4410dy (si4410dy)》之铭言： : 17. (26864-!-item-!-188;#058&003368) : At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. : However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the : Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating : would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on : stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height : tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high : tables and stools, its profits would increase. : The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason : to believe that it is likely that : (A) some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to : sit at the tall tables if they were available : (B) the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood : compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals : (C) a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would : be an exception to the generalization about lingering : (D) a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically : order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer : (E) with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers : interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tabl : OA:C : 想请问这题的D选项 : 花较少时间吃饭通常点的较便宜，反之亦然 : 为何不能这样解: : 部分换成高脚桌椅的点的变成较便宜所以profit不会increase : 这样感觉像否定因有他因(高的点的较便宜)的weaken : 脑袋转不过来 麻烦指教 感谢~~~ -- Donz + Keewee 11月四周速成实力班: http://ppt.cc/2oGt Donz GMAT FB: https://www.facebook.com/groups/DonzGMAT ----

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc), 来自: 1.161.147.118 ※ 文章网址: http://webptt.com/cn.aspx?n=bbs/GMAT/M.1415891279.A.142.html ※ 编辑: ndxica (1.161.147.118), 11/13/2014 23:15:20